indeed... what is justice... whose justice? wengine hapa wanavent JUSTICE! JUSTICE! kumbe nikungojea mkono ianguke!

Looking at the evidence alone the likelihood for conviction is very high especially for the president. Please consider what the court believed in the confirmation

1. Witness OTP-12 who confirms both that 8 million KSh was brought to Maina Njenga in prison and that the person who gave this money to Maina Njenga was sent by Mr. Kenyatta.

2.According to Witness OTP-12, in late January 2008, before the commission of the crimes in Naivasha, Maina Njenga was given another 20 million KSh, which was brought to him in prison again by Maina Diambo.

3.What needs to be established is exclusively
whether Mr. Kenyatta used the Mungiki for the purposes of the commission of the crimes. In fact, in order to attribute the crimes committed by the Mungiki to Mr. Kenyatta, it is not necessary that Mungiki members share the purpose or the motive of the suspects; quite the opposite, within the scheme of indirect co-perpetration.

4. Regardless of the party that presented it, direct evidence that is both relevant and trustworthy has a high probative value. It follows that a single piece of direct evidence may be decisive for the Chamber's determination.

5. The Defence of Mr. Kenyatta mounted a comprehensive challenge to the credibility of Witnesses OTP-11 and OTP-12. Having carefully reviewed in detail the relevant documents, and in particular the excerpts cited during the hearing,Chamber concludes that no such extortion attempt occurred...

Do you think he will survive? This is not an ordinary court it is a victim's court. The President if he is naive to go for trial will be convicted just like his dad Jomo who was convicted on perjured evidence of one Rawson Macharia. Remember prosecution does not need to convince the kenyan public it just needs to convince two mzungu judges and it's a done deal.

I wouldn't go to such a Kangaroo court and pretend to expect justice.

i always read and hear of how the prosecution did a shoddy job, how the real culprits are out there etc. it seems people like you on the internet have some information that us mortals do not have. how is it that you can arrive to this conclusion without having access to the full case and evidence against the two?

According to one @Mkenyan, how do Judges normally arrive at a Judgement? Is it not by examining every Statement that has been made by the accused, Defense and Prosecution lawyers, witnesses etc. Which leads me to the next question. Have you been following the Proceedings.

And What are you referring to when you say I do not have access to the "Full case"?

Why are some wazuans so naive???So u guys think that the owners of ICC has interests of victims at heart?U need to think again.This a game of interests and victims and their justice are just collateral damage in greater scheme