High Court orders Ariel adverts suspended - Review - Wazua

Welcome Guest

Wazua » Market » Review » High Court orders Ariel adverts suspended

High Court orders Ariel adverts suspended

Options

Previous Topic · Next Topic

Impunity		#1 Posted : Wednesday, September 18, 2013 11:39:09 AM
Rank: Elder Joined: 3/2/2009 Posts: 26,330 Location: Masada		Nonsense if u ask me Rink. Portfolio: Sold You know you've made it when you get a parking space for your yatcht.
Back to top		Report Abusive \| Report SPAM
User Profile

butterflyke		#2 Posted : Wednesday, September 18, 2013 11:46:48 AM
Rank: Elder Joined: 5/1/2010 Posts: 3,024 Location: Hapa		at first when I read the heading of the article, thought it was about Airtel and the sms location tracker fiasco..... Float like a butterfly, sting like a bee. - Muhammad Ali🐝
Back to top		Report Abusive \| Report SPAM
User Profile

webish		#3 Posted : Wednesday, September 18, 2013 11:49:29 AM
Rank: Member Joined: 10/19/2009 Posts: 671 Location: Nairobi		QUOTE: "Unilever had applied that “the adverts falsely and by implication depict their product Omo as being grossly incapable of removing stains in one wash,” and thus sought to stop the adverts until the court determined the same. Unilever is aggrieved by Procter & Gamble’s prime time TV adverts that promote Ariel as the best stain-removing detergent compared to other products." Really? Life is joy, death is peace, but the transition is very difficult.
Back to top		WWW Report Abusive \| Report SPAM
User Profile

Impunity		#4 Posted : Wednesday, September 18, 2013 11:58:46 AM
Rank: Elder Joined: 3/2/2009 Posts: 26,330 Location: Masada		webish wrote: QUOTE: "Unilever had applied that “the adverts falsely and by implication depict their product Omo as being grossly incapable of removing stains in one wash,” and thus sought to stop the adverts until the court determined the same. Unilever is aggrieved by Procter & Gamble’s prime time TV adverts that promote Ariel as the best stain-removing detergent compared to other products." Really? THIEVES!!!!!! Portfolio: Sold You know you've made it when you get a parking space for your yatcht.
Back to top		Report Abusive \| Report SPAM
User Profile

Lolest!		#5 Posted : Wednesday, September 18, 2013 12:24:48 PM
Rank: Elder Joined: 3/18/2011 Posts: 12,069 Location: Kianjokoma		webish wrote: QUOTE: "Unilever had applied that “the adverts falsely and by implication depict their product Omo as being grossly incapable of removing stains in one wash,” and thus sought to stop the adverts until the court determined the same. Unilever is aggrieved by Procter & Gamble’s prime time TV adverts that promote Ariel as the best stain-removing detergent compared to other products." Really? 1. High Court has just suspended airing of the advert not banned its airing indefinitely. Pending the hearing of the case. 2. Unilever have a good case IMHO. It's not 'other products' as you guys are putting it but 'sabuni inayotumika zaidi' =OMO!!
Back to top		Report Abusive \| Report SPAM
User Profile

mukiha		#6 Posted : Wednesday, September 18, 2013 2:07:23 PM
Rank: Elder Joined: 6/27/2008 Posts: 4,114		Lolest! wrote: webish wrote: QUOTE: "Unilever had applied that “the adverts falsely and by implication depict their product Omo as being grossly incapable of removing stains in one wash,” and thus sought to stop the adverts until the court determined the same. Unilever is aggrieved by Procter & Gamble’s prime time TV adverts that promote Ariel as the best stain-removing detergent compared to other products." Really? 1. High Court has just suspended airing of the advert not banned its airing indefinitely. Pending the hearing of the case. 2. Unilever have a good case IMHO. It's not 'other products' as you guys are putting it but 'sabuni inayotumika zaidi' =OMO!! After using both products, I think the ad is an accurate depiction. But still, I'd have thought that this is matter that could have been arbitrated by some other entity, say, MSK. The high court is too busy with more important matters than marketing rivalry! Nothing is real unless it can be named; nothing has value unless it can be sold; money is worthless unless you spend it.
Back to top		Report Abusive \| Report SPAM
User Profile

Impunity		#7 Posted : Wednesday, September 18, 2013 2:35:45 PM
Rank: Elder Joined: 3/2/2009 Posts: 26,330 Location: Masada		mukiha wrote: Lolest! wrote: webish wrote: QUOTE: "Unilever had applied that “the adverts falsely and by implication depict their product Omo as being grossly incapable of removing stains in one wash,” and thus sought to stop the adverts until the court determined the same. Unilever is aggrieved by Procter & Gamble’s prime time TV adverts that promote Ariel as the best stain-removing detergent compared to other products." Really? 1. High Court has just suspended airing of the advert not banned its airing indefinitely. Pending the hearing of the case. 2. Unilever have a good case IMHO. It's not 'other products' as you guys are putting it but 'sabuni inayotumika zaidi' =OMO!! After using both products, I think the ad is an accurate depiction. But still, I'd have thought that this is matter that could have been arbitrated by some other entity, say, MSK. The high court is too busy with more important matters than marketing rivalry! In my house Ariel is king...I stopped buying OMO ages ago! Portfolio: Sold You know you've made it when you get a parking space for your yatcht.
Back to top		Report Abusive \| Report SPAM
User Profile

obiero		#8 Posted : Wednesday, September 18, 2013 8:12:59 PM
Rank: Elder Joined: 6/23/2009 Posts: 13,906 Location: nairobi		Impunity wrote: mukiha wrote: Lolest! wrote: webish wrote: QUOTE: "Unilever had applied that “the adverts falsely and by implication depict their product Omo as being grossly incapable of removing stains in one wash,” and thus sought to stop the adverts until the court determined the same. Unilever is aggrieved by Procter & Gamble’s prime time TV adverts that promote Ariel as the best stain-removing detergent compared to other products." Really? 1. High Court has just suspended airing of the advert not banned its airing indefinitely. Pending the hearing of the case. 2. Unilever have a good case IMHO. It's not 'other products' as you guys are putting it but 'sabuni inayotumika zaidi' =OMO!! After using both products, I think the ad is an accurate depiction. But still, I'd have thought that this is matter that could have been arbitrated by some other entity, say, MSK. The high court is too busy with more important matters than marketing rivalry! In my house Ariel is king...I stopped buying OMO ages ago! Ariel is better.. Soo true though, that MSK or Consumer Protection Society of Kenya, not certain of exact name, would be good intermediaries. The High Court is too high! COOP ABP 15.85; IMH ABP 35.55; KQ ABP 5.75; MTN ABP 5.20
Back to top		WWW Report Abusive \| Report SPAM
User Profile

Users browsing this topic
Guest (2)

Wazua » Market » Review » High Court orders Ariel adverts suspended

Forum Jump

You cannot post new topics in this forum.
You cannot reply to topics in this forum.
You cannot delete your posts in this forum.
You cannot edit your posts in this forum.
You cannot create polls in this forum.
You cannot vote in polls in this forum.

Watch this topic
Email this topic
Print this topic
RSS Feed

Normal
Threaded