Rank: Elder Joined: 3/2/2007 Posts: 8,776 Location: Cameroon
|
masukuma wrote:InnovateGuy wrote:OTP could have done better research. That PPT chart made me  . It adds nothing to their case! All said and done, Khan is impressive. do you remember the tongue lashing OTP received from Judge Christine van den Wyngaert? Christine van den Wyngaert wrote:
… there are serious questions as to whether the prosecution conducted a full and thorough investigation of the case against the accused prior to confirmation … the prosecution offers no cogent and sufficiently specific justification for why so many witnesses in this case were only interviewed for the first time post-confirmation … there can be no excuse for the prosecution's negligent attitude towards verifying the trustworthiness of its evidence.
Akina Khan will cash in on this proper! Very nice, mberrow the pot belly. TULIA.........UFUNZWE!
|
|
|
Rank: Veteran Joined: 9/21/2011 Posts: 2,032
|
From where I sit, this could go either way.
While the defence seeks to prove Ruto & Sang were not directly responsible, the prosecution seeks to prove they were indirectly responsible! The case is Bensounda’s to lose if you ask me!!
|
|
|
Rank: Elder Joined: 10/4/2006 Posts: 13,823 Location: Nairobi
|
there are two kinds of people in this world.... both claim they know stuff. one says: Quote:
here are the facts on which i base my conclusion
and another says: Quote:
here is the conclusion on which i base my facts
OTP is accused of doing the latter! All Mushrooms are edible! Some Mushroom are only edible ONCE!
|
|
|
Rank: Veteran Joined: 2/3/2012 Posts: 1,317
|
limanika wrote:From where I sit, this could go either way.
While the defence seeks to prove Ruto & Sang were not directly responsible, the prosecution seeks to prove they were indirectly responsible! The case is Bensounda’s to lose if you ask me!!
I disagree with you on that one. If you have been listening to Khan he has set out to discredit ALL the prosecutions witnesses including the investigation itself. Lets wait and see.
|
|
|
Rank: Elder Joined: 6/17/2008 Posts: 23,365 Location: Nairobi
|
The only land Ruto had, he has since returned to Muteshi....ok!!!! ..."Wewe ni mtu mdogo sana....na mwenye amekuandika pia ni mtu mdogo sana!".
|
|
|
Rank: Elder Joined: 10/23/2008 Posts: 3,966
|
McReggae wrote:The only land Ruto had, he has since returned to Muteshi....ok!!!!  Luck is when Preparation meets Opportunity. ~ Lucius Annaeus Seneca
|
|
|
Rank: Veteran Joined: 9/21/2011 Posts: 2,032
|
kollabo wrote:limanika wrote:From where I sit, this could go either way.
While the defence seeks to prove Ruto & Sang were not directly responsible, the prosecution seeks to prove they were indirectly responsible! The case is Bensounda’s to lose if you ask me!!
I disagree with you on that one. If you have been listening to Khan he has set out to discredit ALL the prosecutions witnesses including the investigation itself. Lets wait and see. This case is tricky to defence since they do not know what ‘’hard’’evidence Bensouda will present. If they provide video of those hot ODM 07 rallies and Sang’s call-in Broadcasts, plus a few testimonies by witnesses, the theory of indirect responsibility (not direct) may not be far-fetched. I however wish our boys come back unscathed, and Bensounda asked to nail down those directly responsible instead. But we must wake up to the reality that it could go either way, due to the very low threshold of evidence required
|
|
|
Rank: Veteran Joined: 1/16/2007 Posts: 1,320
|
Tsk ? So far kesi haina miguu...but WE WAIT ama vipi @magreens ?
|
|
|
Rank: Veteran Joined: 9/19/2011 Posts: 1,694
|
limanika wrote:kollabo wrote:limanika wrote:From where I sit, this could go either way.
While the defence seeks to prove Ruto & Sang were not directly responsible, the prosecution seeks to prove they were indirectly responsible! The case is Bensounda’s to lose if you ask me!!
I disagree with you on that one. If you have been listening to Khan he has set out to discredit ALL the prosecutions witnesses including the investigation itself. Lets wait and see. This case is tricky to defence since they do not know what ‘’hard’’evidence Bensouda will present. If they provide video of those hot ODM 07 rallies and Sang’s call-in Broadcasts, plus a few testimonies by witnesses, the theory of indirect responsibility (not direct) may not be far-fetched. I however wish our boys come back unscathed, and Bensounda asked to nail down those directly responsible instead. But we must wake up to the reality that it could go either way, due to the very low threshold of evidence required I thought the prosecution was required to give the defense the evidence?
“People will believe a big lie sooner than a little one, and if you repeat it frequently enough, people will sooner or later believe it.” ― Walter C. Langer
|
|
|
Rank: Elder Joined: 10/23/2008 Posts: 3,966
|
Kratos wrote:limanika wrote:kollabo wrote:limanika wrote:From where I sit, this could go either way.
While the defence seeks to prove Ruto & Sang were not directly responsible, the prosecution seeks to prove they were indirectly responsible! The case is Bensounda’s to lose if you ask me!!
I disagree with you on that one. If you have been listening to Khan he has set out to discredit ALL the prosecutions witnesses including the investigation itself. Lets wait and see. This case is tricky to defence since they do not know what ‘’hard’’evidence Bensouda will present. If they provide video of those hot ODM 07 rallies and Sang’s call-in Broadcasts, plus a few testimonies by witnesses, the theory of indirect responsibility (not direct) may not be far-fetched. I however wish our boys come back unscathed, and Bensounda asked to nail down those directly responsible instead. But we must wake up to the reality that it could go either way, due to the very low threshold of evidence required I thought the prosecution was required to give the defense the evidence? I concur. Luck is when Preparation meets Opportunity. ~ Lucius Annaeus Seneca
|
|
|
Forum Jump
You cannot post new topics in this forum.
You cannot reply to topics in this forum.
You cannot delete your posts in this forum.
You cannot edit your posts in this forum.
You cannot create polls in this forum.
You cannot vote in polls in this forum.
|