Much Know wrote:Each case should be reviewed individually, on what is in our best interest, for the above, they are appointees and have little or no effect, but if it will cost us billions/elections/replacing with corrupt and incompetent popular choices to make a small point If Someone has collected 80billion through his effort,intellect, business acumen, solid proposals, plans etc to make our collective lives better/happier, then it is passed to for example yt2, you have to evaluate. Justice cuts two ways. Case by case. I agree with the bulk of what you say however, restraint is important.
Thanks,
Performance vs character.
Does good performance in office supercede one's bad character? am thinking abt guys like sonko,the mp who slapped a cop etc etc.
We are lowering our standards of intergrity by focusing on performance.