Back in '05 when Kenya as a country ratified the Rome Statute, what was the reasoning? What was the motivation? Who supported or opposed it then and on which side of the fence do they sit today? What has since changed to necessitate a change of heart? These, to me, are the important questions.

If those intent on withdrawing from the ICC are driven only by the desire to "punish" the court for trying "their own", then I must disagree with them. If those on the opposite side are motivated only by the fact that the ICC is barbecuing their "opponents", then I must disagree with them. And I worry that this sounds too much like the script playing out in Bunge.

maybe you haven't noticed but even on wazua a majority pulled out of political debates.

Why debate the obvious lending credence to stage managed anger?

ICC is here to stay and it starts on Monday not 90 years from now.

You are a bigger one. Go away. You are not needed here. Please go, or else you change your name.

May be DP will appeal and appeal for the next 84 years to make the whole process 90 years as he had prophesied!

This is your first post and abusing the gavament. ok, isorite. You need to great wazee fisrt.