@Mukiha,The meter system in the1980's! Woooo,thats ancient... and you say am looking down on them?
As you rightly pointed out,the meter system was archaic but was fair. Introducing the flat rate was only an easier way out but it does not make it right. CCN (If you please) has the resources but lacks the will and expartise to invest in a more suitable system,mark you,since the 80's....and you say am looking down on them!
Parking Fees is supposed to be a deterrent but by all means fair and therefore be prorated on the basis of consumption of the service.The KAPS system being an ideal example.And just so you know,in my system you are charged more if you pay by the hour than you would be charged if you paid for the entire day. So,yes,my system is a deterrent but also fair. Its a win-win system,if you like.
I have approached a Lawyer who is working on the contract document. As for the patent,they take too long and will probably not be honored given our legal system.
FYI*It depends on which side of the divide you are,for me,CCN stole ADOPT-A-LIGHTS idea.....but i guess that is neither here or there so we will leave that for the courts.I only used them as an example to drive my point home. Your point is nevertheless noted.
May we live in interesting times!