wazua Sat, Jun 27, 2026
Welcome Guest Search | Active Topics | Log In

9 Pages<12345>»
The unanimous decision
thuks
#21 Posted : Tuesday, April 02, 2013 2:53:11 PM
Rank: Veteran

Joined: 10/8/2008
Posts: 1,575
McReggae wrote:
ZZE123 wrote:
McReggae wrote:
The lobbying to have a unanimous decision by the SC was plain wrong.

Who did the lobbying?


Logging off in a few minutes and may not be able to take this arguement to the full length.....on the hindsight given what had been planned, I think the SC had to announce as they did!!!

.......do you think in 2017 somebody will take a presidential petition to the high court???


No. Hata hii ni vile hakungewezekana mambo ya street.
I care!
Jus Blazin
#22 Posted : Tuesday, April 02, 2013 2:56:48 PM
Rank: Elder

Joined: 10/23/2008
Posts: 3,966
McReggae wrote:
hindi ni riu wrote:
McReggae wrote:
ZZE123 wrote:
McReggae wrote:
The lobbying to have a unanimous decision by the SC was plain wrong.

Who did the lobbying?


Logging off in a few minutes and may not be able to take this arguement to the full length.....on the hindsight given what had been planned, I think the SC had to announce as they did!!!

.......do you think in 2017 somebody will take a presidential petition to the high court???


Am missing the point here....so the only way the judges would have been right is if they ruled in favor of the petitioner?


So much is hidden from Wanjiku in Kenya,

I just asked a simple question.....your honest answer???

Come to think about it, the most imposrtant decision is what they tell the country in the 14 day window period......not some details they wanna avail in two weeks which have no bearing on the petition that was placed at the SC.

......us on the other side have agreed to live with it, we ask you to also trust them in the future, you defy and we shall always remind you of the Mutunga Unanimous of 2013!!!!

PEACE!!

You've always told us to watch this space McR. Maybe you need to create that space.
Luck is when Preparation meets Opportunity. ~ Lucius Annaeus Seneca
mukiha
#23 Posted : Tuesday, April 02, 2013 3:05:22 PM
Rank: Elder

Joined: 6/27/2008
Posts: 4,114
McReggae wrote:
The lobbying to have a unanimous decision by the SC was plain wrong.


Who lobbied and when?
Nothing is real unless it can be named; nothing has value unless it can be sold; money is worthless unless you spend it.
poundfoolish
#24 Posted : Tuesday, April 02, 2013 3:14:27 PM
Rank: Elder

Joined: 12/2/2009
Posts: 2,458
Location: Nairobi
mukiha wrote:
McReggae wrote:
The lobbying to have a unanimous decision by the SC was plain wrong.


Who lobbied and when?

McR has since said the decision was accepted and we move on..

I hope he doesn't come back to explain himself further..

Tusonge mbele
XSK
#25 Posted : Tuesday, April 02, 2013 3:42:45 PM
Rank: Veteran

Joined: 12/8/2009
Posts: 975
Location: Nairobi
poundfoolish wrote:
mukiha wrote:
McReggae wrote:
The lobbying to have a unanimous decision by the SC was plain wrong.


Who lobbied and when?

McR has since said the decision was accepted and we move on..

I hope he doesn't come back to explain himself further..

Tusonge mbele


As i had indicated elsewhere if you take every word by McReggae seriously utapata ulcers! he has this uncanny ability to twist situations to suit his "dreams". Take evrything he says with a bucket of salt.

PEACE!
You will know that you have arrived when money and time are not mutually exclusive "events" in you life!
harrydre
#26 Posted : Tuesday, April 02, 2013 3:52:18 PM
Rank: Elder

Joined: 7/10/2008
Posts: 9,131
Location: Kanjo
Jus Blazin wrote:
McReggae wrote:
hindi ni riu wrote:
McReggae wrote:
ZZE123 wrote:
McReggae wrote:
The lobbying to have a unanimous decision by the SC was plain wrong.

Who did the lobbying?


Logging off in a few minutes and may not be able to take this arguement to the full length.....on the hindsight given what had been planned, I think the SC had to announce as they did!!!

.......do you think in 2017 somebody will take a presidential petition to the high court???


Am missing the point here....so the only way the judges would have been right is if they ruled in favor of the petitioner?


So much is hidden from Wanjiku in Kenya,

I just asked a simple question.....your honest answer???

Come to think about it, the most imposrtant decision is what they tell the country in the 14 day window period......not some details they wanna avail in two weeks which have no bearing on the petition that was placed at the SC.

......us on the other side have agreed to live with it, we ask you to also trust them in the future, you defy and we shall always remind you of the Mutunga Unanimous of 2013!!!!

PEACE!!

You've always told us to watch this space McR. Maybe you need to create that space.


smile smile i remember that.
i.am.back!!!!
MaichBlack
#27 Posted : Tuesday, April 02, 2013 3:53:23 PM
Rank: Elder

Joined: 7/22/2009
Posts: 7,924
There is a simple reason the decision was UNANIMOUS!!! This case was BOGUS!!! It couldn't hold water.

On the day of the decision [on Saturday] I asked people [on the political thread] what they were waiting for and yet there could be only one ruling. Visit this link [Post #74]

I asked two pertinent questions:-

1) Did the petitioner prove his case?
2) You were promised EXPLOSIVE details/dossier. Did you see any explosive dossier?

The answer to this question [for someone with a sober mind] is obvious!

I don't know what it is about politics that makes otherwise intelligent individuals totally lose their power of thinking/reasoning.

Take a case today to the SC challenging the right of the girl child to free education and of course they will return a unanimous decision! Then you start saying "There can never be a unanimous decison at the Supreme Court...". What kind of reasoning is that???
Never count on making a good sale. Have the purchase price be so attractive that even a mediocre sale gives good returns.
MaichBlack
#28 Posted : Tuesday, April 02, 2013 3:56:44 PM
Rank: Elder

Joined: 7/22/2009
Posts: 7,924
mukiha wrote:
McReggae wrote:
The lobbying to have a unanimous decision by the SC was plain wrong.


Who lobbied and when?

Some people expected the judges to be as tribal as them! I use to hear people saying that it will be 3 - 3 and then they proceed to divide/group the judges using tribes!!! Seriously???? And those are "educated" Kenyans. You wonder how the illiterate Kenyans are supposed to reason!
Never count on making a good sale. Have the purchase price be so attractive that even a mediocre sale gives good returns.
MaichBlack
#29 Posted : Tuesday, April 02, 2013 3:58:31 PM
Rank: Elder

Joined: 7/22/2009
Posts: 7,924
Magigi wrote:
...and in other news: MP vows to move bill to sack Supreme Court judges. http://www.nation.co.ke/.../-/x3cl7rz/-/index.html
"He also questioned how Supreme Court Judges Jackton Ojwang, Mohammed Ibrahim and Philip Tunoi, all previously from High Court, joined their three colleagues in making a unanimous decision.


C & P

#SomeonetellMPS Aprils Fools day was on 1st of April.

Laughing out loudly Laughing out loudly Laughing out loudly Laughing out loudly Laughing out loudly
Never count on making a good sale. Have the purchase price be so attractive that even a mediocre sale gives good returns.
alma
#30 Posted : Tuesday, April 02, 2013 4:00:32 PM
Rank: Elder

Joined: 7/20/2007
Posts: 4,432
Enyewe

The ruling was on Saturday and no amount of psychophancy or redoing history will help.

Some of us just have to learn how to accept loss without the rest of the world in the murky waters of "i will never lose, until I win."

Maneno haya yaliisha. Lets talk about laptops now.
Jose: If I make it through this thug life, I'll see you one day. The Lord is the only way to stop the hurt.
9 Pages<12345>»
Forum Jump  
You cannot post new topics in this forum.
You cannot reply to topics in this forum.
You cannot delete your posts in this forum.
You cannot edit your posts in this forum.
You cannot create polls in this forum.
You cannot vote in polls in this forum.

Copyright © 2026 Wazua.co.ke. All Rights Reserved.