Politics update Wed 27-Mar-13 - Page 6 - Politics - Wazua

Welcome Guest

Wazua » Club SK » Politics » Politics update Wed 27-Mar-13

Politics update Wed 27-Mar-13

Options

Previous Topic · Next Topic

ecstacy		#51 Posted : Wednesday, March 27, 2013 11:23:01 AM
Rank: Elder Joined: 2/26/2008 Posts: 4,449		The Supreme Court is relying on evidence filed with the case not after the fishing expedition when you have already filed the case. New requests are subject to a legal time frame.
Back to top		\| \| Edit by user: Wednesday, March 27, 2013 11:26 AM \| Reason: Not specified
User Profile

Bigchick		#52 Posted : Wednesday, March 27, 2013 11:23:38 AM
Rank: Elder Joined: 2/8/2013 Posts: 4,068 Location: At Large.		maka wrote: kiriita wrote: maka wrote: KulaRaha wrote: Impunity wrote: Morey wrote: Kilonzo notice to produce kicked out Do we still need to go full trial if all major evidence have been time barred? Waste of time to be honest, this isn't a free trial, its a joke. All those things arent the backbone of the case... Agree with maka. The 'real petition' or at least a large chunk of it is at KICC.... What have been disallowed are interlocutory applications. This SC is too rigid it has elevated the burden of evidence and adduction of documents to a fetish and is too reliant on technical objections In matters legal, mimi ni mpita njia.So please enlighten me:-What is the backbone of this petition? If the rejected prayers were to prop up the petition, what will happen without them?? Love is beautiful and so are those who share it.With Love, Marriage is an amazing event in ones life time, the foundation of joy, happiness and success.
Back to top		\|
User Profile

maka		#53 Posted : Wednesday, March 27, 2013 11:26:36 AM
Rank: Elder Joined: 4/22/2010 Posts: 11,522 Location: Nairobi		McReggae wrote: radio wrote: If the court accepts the ongoing submission about exclusion rejected vote, will we still have a case? The case starts after the ruling on the rejected votes!!! Hii SC ikikubali sijui... The Constitution is very clear. Article 138 (4)(a) "A candidate shall be declared elected as President if the candidate recieves- more than half of ALL the votes cast in the election". What does ALL mean? possunt quia posse videntur
Back to top		\|
User Profile

kingfisher		#54 Posted : Wednesday, March 27, 2013 11:26:43 AM
Rank: Elder Joined: 4/9/2008 Posts: 2,824		washiku wrote: KulaRaha wrote: innairobi wrote: Orengo and co. trying to enter the tallying center? Exact figures may change but clearly the election was lost by at least 800k and maybe even a million. The recount should perhaps have included Rangwe constituency which had a 96.4% turnout - the highest in the country and an obvious red flag if one is looking for stuffing. If I recall the highest turnout was somewhere is Wajir at 99.5%. But Orengo does not do his side any favours. Bad behaviour. Who remembers that polling centre in Rift valley which had 100% turnout? There were I think 9 registered voters, they all knew each other. There was one mlevi who had not voted by around 4 and they had to go for him to come vote so is there a problem with that... 9 out of 9 ACTUALLY voting? When I have money, I get rid of it quickly, lest it find a way into my heart.
Back to top		\|
User Profile

KulaRaha		#55 Posted : Wednesday, March 27, 2013 11:29:30 AM
Rank: Elder Joined: 7/26/2007 Posts: 6,514		maka wrote: McReggae wrote: radio wrote: If the court accepts the ongoing submission about exclusion rejected vote, will we still have a case? The case starts after the ruling on the rejected votes!!! Hii SC ikikubali sijui... The Constitution is very clear. Article 138 (4)(a) "A candidate shall be declared elected as President if the candidate recieves- more than half of ALL the votes cast in the election". What does ALL mean? I hear the Constitution may be time-barred as the whole book will take too long to read... Business opportunities are like buses,there's always another one coming
Back to top		\|
User Profile

2012		#56 Posted : Wednesday, March 27, 2013 11:30:21 AM
Rank: Elder Joined: 12/9/2009 Posts: 6,592 Location: Nairobi		Were rejected votes included in the tally? BBI will solve it :)
Back to top		\|
User Profile

maka		#57 Posted : Wednesday, March 27, 2013 11:31:23 AM
Rank: Elder Joined: 4/22/2010 Posts: 11,522 Location: Nairobi		KulaRaha wrote: maka wrote: McReggae wrote: radio wrote: If the court accepts the ongoing submission about exclusion rejected vote, will we still have a case? The case starts after the ruling on the rejected votes!!! Hii SC ikikubali sijui... The Constitution is very clear. Article 138 (4)(a) "A candidate shall be declared elected as President if the candidate recieves- more than half of ALL the votes cast in the election". What does ALL mean? I hear the Constitution may be time-barred as the whole book will take too long to read... hapo watakuwa wameenda mbali surely possunt quia posse videntur
Back to top		\|
User Profile

2012		#58 Posted : Wednesday, March 27, 2013 11:32:09 AM
Rank: Elder Joined: 12/9/2009 Posts: 6,592 Location: Nairobi		kingfisher wrote: washiku wrote: KulaRaha wrote: innairobi wrote: Orengo and co. trying to enter the tallying center? Exact figures may change but clearly the election was lost by at least 800k and maybe even a million. The recount should perhaps have included Rangwe constituency which had a 96.4% turnout - the highest in the country and an obvious red flag if one is looking for stuffing. If I recall the highest turnout was somewhere is Wajir at 99.5%. But Orengo does not do his side any favours. Bad behaviour. Who remembers that polling centre in Rift valley which had 100% turnout? There were I think 9 registered voters, they all knew each other. There was one mlevi who had not voted by around 4 and they had to go for him to come vote so is there a problem with that... 9 out of 9 ACTUALLY voting? I think the problem is that there should be one spoilt vote BBI will solve it :)
Back to top		\|
User Profile

madollar		#59 Posted : Wednesday, March 27, 2013 11:35:19 AM
Rank: Veteran Joined: 11/17/2009 Posts: 2,040 Location: GA		CORD was also talking about the total presidential tally exceeding the total governors tally by 1 million votes..............
Back to top		\|
User Profile

KulaRaha		#60 Posted : Wednesday, March 27, 2013 11:36:45 AM
Rank: Elder Joined: 7/26/2007 Posts: 6,514		madollar wrote: CORD was also talking about the total presidential tally exceeding the total governors tally by 1 million votes.............. Sometimes CORD should talk less and do less and think more. Business opportunities are like buses,there's always another one coming
Back to top		\|
User Profile

22 Pages«<45678>»

Wazua » Club SK » Politics » Politics update Wed 27-Mar-13

Forum Jump

You cannot post new topics in this forum.
You cannot reply to topics in this forum.
You cannot delete your posts in this forum.
You cannot edit your posts in this forum.
You cannot create polls in this forum.
You cannot vote in polls in this forum.

Watch this topic
Print this topic

Normal
Threaded