wazua Fri, Jun 26, 2026
Welcome Guest Search | Active Topics | Log In

20 Pages«<181920
Politics update Tue 26-Mar-13
Shotgun
#191 Posted : Tuesday, March 26, 2013 7:19:20 PM
Rank: Member

Joined: 8/10/2008
Posts: 480
*claims on Twitter regarding tallying exercise*
wazua wrote:
For the record, Subjudice rules in common law consider the following activities contempt:
- publishing information obtained from confidential court documents;
- anticipating the course of a trial or predicting the outcome;

*comments added by moderator

https://twitter.com/SokoAnalyst/status/316582277217910784
Shotgun
#192 Posted : Tuesday, March 26, 2013 7:39:35 PM
Rank: Member

Joined: 8/10/2008
Posts: 480

Good Job Lady Admin. Now that is moderating.

Much obliged... smile

By the way, how comes you don't encourage us to use the 'Report Abuse' button?

You need to conduct some 'civic education' on it especially now.



maka
#193 Posted : Tuesday, March 26, 2013 8:38:18 PM
Rank: Elder

Joined: 4/22/2010
Posts: 11,522
Location: Nairobi
Shotgun wrote:
*claims on Twitter regarding tallying exercise*
wazua wrote:
For the record, Subjudice rules in common law consider the following activities contempt:
- publishing information obtained from confidential court documents;
- anticipating the course of a trial or predicting the outcome;

*comments added by moderator

https://twitter.com/SokoAnalyst/status/316582277217910784

spot on...
possunt quia posse videntur
harrydre
#194 Posted : Tuesday, March 26, 2013 9:24:04 PM
Rank: Elder

Joined: 7/10/2008
Posts: 9,131
Location: Kanjo
murchr wrote:
kingfisher wrote:

The Elections Act No.24 of 2011

Section 44. The Commission may use such technology as it considers appropriate in the electoral process.

what does that mean in view of failed technology???


Key words MAY, they therefore are not compelled.

The constitution however doesnt push for the use of technology in elections



true that though someone need to pay for the lost Tax payers billions. This is another scam. That Audit was important to establish what really caused the system to fail for future elections just like the rejected votes petition is aimed for future elections. Did I read someone that Malawi dropped the Electronic System?
i.am.back!!!!
harrydre
#195 Posted : Tuesday, March 26, 2013 9:39:21 PM
Rank: Elder

Joined: 7/10/2008
Posts: 9,131
Location: Kanjo
McReggae wrote:
Somebody has rushed to open a twitter accounr @kethikilonzo.....a fake!!!!

Her correct handle is @finlegal!!!!



hiyo yako ni fake pia, the correct one is @finclegal
i.am.back!!!!
harrydre
#196 Posted : Tuesday, March 26, 2013 9:41:05 PM
Rank: Elder

Joined: 7/10/2008
Posts: 9,131
Location: Kanjo
Shotgun wrote:

Good Job Lady Admin. Now that is moderating.

Much obliged... smile

By the way, how comes you don't encourage us to use the 'Report Abuse' button?

You need to conduct some 'civic education' on it especially now.





True that..aendelee vivyo hivo.
i.am.back!!!!
harrydre
#197 Posted : Tuesday, March 26, 2013 9:49:09 PM
Rank: Elder

Joined: 7/10/2008
Posts: 9,131
Location: Kanjo
masukuma wrote:
washiku wrote:
As a layman, would someone explain to me why IEBC would be unwilling to give the register as its being requested? Why exactly is it difficult apart from the voluminous nature?


IEBC has not refused. This register in in over 33k ballot boxes in 290 constituencies across the country. they said they are willing - but IT WILL TAKE TIME!!


if there was a claim of 1.5million 'fake' voters, the most obvious thing the supreme judges should do is ask the petitioner to point those out from the register, the next step should be for IEBC to prove(or fail) that those are indeed existing human Kenyans eligible to vote. A sample of maybe 40 or 50 should work.
i.am.back!!!!
Mukiri
#198 Posted : Tuesday, March 26, 2013 9:53:17 PM
Rank: Elder

Joined: 7/11/2012
Posts: 5,222
I like the intensity and detail of the case, it's one thing justice being done and bigger thing justice being seen. A few days and someone will stop disturbing the country once and for all, in law.

Proverbs 19:21
murchr
#199 Posted : Tuesday, March 26, 2013 10:23:31 PM
Rank: Elder

Joined: 2/26/2012
Posts: 15,980
harrydre wrote:
murchr wrote:
kingfisher wrote:

The Elections Act No.24 of 2011

Section 44. The Commission may use such technology as it considers appropriate in the electoral process.

what does that mean in view of failed technology???


Key words MAY, they therefore are not compelled.

The constitution however doesnt push for the use of technology in elections



true that though someone need to pay for the lost Tax payers billions. This is another scam. That Audit was important to establish what really caused the system to fail for future elections just like the rejected votes petition is aimed for future elections. Did I read someone that Malawi dropped the Electronic System?


I think a commission of inquiry is best suited for that, its the best forum to evaluate such matters. smile
"There are only two emotions in the market, hope & fear. The problem is you hope when you should fear & fear when you should hope: - Jesse Livermore
.
20 Pages«<181920
Forum Jump  
You cannot post new topics in this forum.
You cannot reply to topics in this forum.
You cannot delete your posts in this forum.
You cannot edit your posts in this forum.
You cannot create polls in this forum.
You cannot vote in polls in this forum.

Copyright © 2026 Wazua.co.ke. All Rights Reserved.