This one is a bit fudgy: neither side can prove the other right/wrong. They should lave him alone. It makes for bad press once you start arresting people especially when you are focussing on the losing side.

Its not whether he is right or not.Its what he symbolizes which at the very least is frustration and resistance.

(Maybe the system time was not properly set?...>>>

I agree with @KulaRaha easier to leave him alone.
Well said @Ms Mkenya he is incorrigible. Even more surprising his frequent tribal/abusive comments go unnoticed. Of late his crusade seems to be attracting some followers who, though rarely, seem to be using him as a whistle-blower.

The response by government may appear to lend his allegations some grain of truth. Notice he seemed to report of the meeting LIVE, almost as if an observer was sending him information.

I wonder why there is a lot of hullabaloo about this issue. We need to respect both sides.

1. Alai has right to say whatever he wants-Freedom of expression. However, that freedom should not be left unchecked. Your freedom ends where the other person's freedom starts.

2. The other party(In this case I think Kimemia) feels offended. Thus, point number one comes to play. Alai's freedom was used to offend another party.

What to do now?

Look for arbitration to decide. And that is where the courts come in. We cant compare with Nyayo era, where the police was judges by themselves...Right now, an Independent Judiciary is available to listen to both parties. Whoever wins, we leave it to the court. I would have been angry had Alai been put to detention, Nyayo chamber or such other crude treatments...My burukenge cents