@maka I respect your viewpoint.
@chiraoscuro what is the point of playing a game if you cannot objectively admire when your opponent is competent?

Even if the court ruling may go against her, this lady credibly proved she is not just her father's daughter. She competently handled her 'request to produce' and it has become a dangerous request.

Rightly, the respondents have vigorously objected. She seems to be pursuing a cause against clumsiness not deviousness, and IEBC thus far has been clumsy.

I don't see the big deal with the lawyers in this case, this seems to be common arguments based on written down rules governing the whole process of the presidential election. Considering what the guys are paid I was expecting a different level of preparedness.

e.g show how sample ballot boxes are sealed using visual aids, show using scientific methods how long it would take to bring ballots from wherever they are to the sc ...

this is one of the biggest case in the country and lawyers can't even get the timing right, very amateurish.

If her request is granted and the documents are presented to her, how will she peruse the 750,000 pages of the "marked" register?

She is simply diverting attention!

In fact @chiaroscuro, you've hit the nail on the head. Since the point she's advancing is the principal voters register was vitiated, Supreme Court could request for a sample from those she mentioned; or perhaps examination of the same register for the 22 polling stations.