Wazua
»
Club SK
»
Politics
»
I think Raila will Drop Court Case
Rank: Elder Joined: 4/30/2008 Posts: 6,029
|
dunkang wrote:segemia wrote:josiah33 wrote:Much Know wrote:Shak wrote:Just wondering, what if the judges rule against him and he protests citing partiality, what's his next course of action? From there he can appeal to Hague, ICC. Does the ICC hear election petitions from member states? in 2007 he consulted some sangoma somewhere in South Africa for spiritual intervention so that he could win the elections. In 2013 he sent emissaries to Olumba Olumba in Nigeria for the same task. Probably he might consult the ICC. The Olumba thing just shook me. You want to tell me that his juju is stronger than from Kitui? He has been retained to ensure Coard wins the case.
|
|
|
Rank: Elder Joined: 6/27/2008 Posts: 4,114
|
McReggae wrote:The intolerance won't help any matter either!!!!!  Nothing is real unless it can be named; nothing has value unless it can be sold; money is worthless unless you spend it.
|
|
|
Rank: Elder Joined: 3/31/2008 Posts: 7,081 Location: Kenya
|
Bigchick wrote:Wapi wazee wa Rika ya RAO.They are letting him down.They need to meet urgently and head to RAO home for a Mzee to Mzee talk.
They should tell him anawaibisha.A man must learn to let go............there is time for everything.........A time to w ............and a time to LOOSE (LOSE).
We are wasting time and time is money his constitutional right not withstanding.
I find it strange that forever he is the one who is shortchanged. Raila represents over Five million people who voted for him. They have no problem with him having their case heard. It is not a waste time. It is a constitutional requirement/right. So let the supreme court talk and Raila and his followers will respect that. In Kenya today the law is supreme.
|
|
|
Rank: Elder Joined: 1/27/2011 Posts: 1,777
|
segemia wrote:josiah33 wrote:Much Know wrote:Shak wrote:Just wondering, what if the judges rule against him and he protests citing partiality, what's his next course of action? From there he can appeal to Hague, ICC. Does the ICC hear election petitions from member states? in 2007 he consulted some sangoma somewhere in South Africa for spiritual intervention so that he could win the elections. In 2013 he sent emissaries to Olumba Olumba in Nigeria for the same task. Probably he might consult the ICC. Is it true that miguna miguna said that he(Raila) used to visit a witchdoctor in TZ but now goes to Kit Mikaye at night for some rituals and sacrifices with a witchdoctor there?
|
|
|
Rank: Elder Joined: 3/2/2007 Posts: 8,776 Location: Cameroon
|
Suppose we go for a rerun/runoff then OAR loses again, n he goes to court again since its his constitutional right? Can the court order for a 3rd, 4th or even a 5th rerun??? Awache upus. TULIA.........UFUNZWE!
|
|
|
Rank: Elder Joined: 6/19/2008 Posts: 4,268
|
I dont know if this is as light as we are taking it. Look at it this way. Raila, in his petition, claims there are places in his strongholds where the number of registered voters were reduced and added to his opponents strongholds. If this is true, then wouldn't it mean that those MPs, governors, senators etc in those affected areas were also elected "fraudulently" to use someone's word .... Now, if the whole IEBC process was "flawed", then, does it mean that we would have to repeat the whole thing again? The senators, WR, CR, governors - the whole works? Is there a possibility of other candidates coming out to claim they were also "rigged" out based on the outcome of the case? What would be the implications of only calling for presidential recounting/re-run and not the others or calling for a whole general 're-election"? Someone educate us.
|
|
|
Rank: Elder Joined: 7/26/2007 Posts: 6,514
|
simonkabz wrote:Suppose we go for a rerun/runoff then OAR loses again, n he goes to court again since its his constitutional right? Can the court order for a 3rd, 4th or even a 5th rerun??? Awache upus. LOOOOOL That's like that movie Groundhog Day... Business opportunities are like buses,there's always another one coming
|
|
|
Rank: Elder Joined: 6/19/2008 Posts: 4,268
|
Magigi wrote:Bigchick wrote:Wapi wazee wa Rika ya RAO.They are letting him down.They need to meet urgently and head to RAO home for a Mzee to Mzee talk.
They should tell him anawaibisha.A man must learn to let go............there is time for everything.........A time to w ............and a time to LOOSE (LOSE).
We are wasting time and time is money his constitutional right not withstanding.
I find it strange that forever he is the one who is shortchanged. Raila represents over Five million people who voted for him. They have no problem with him having their case heard. It is not a waste time. It is a constitutional requirement/right. So let the supreme court talk and Raila and his followers will respect that. In Kenya today the law is supreme.
This, i can only hope....
|
|
|
Rank: Elder Joined: 3/31/2008 Posts: 7,081 Location: Kenya
|
Wendz wrote:I dont know if this is as light as we are taking it. Look at it this way. Raila, in his petition, claims there are places in his strongholds where the number of registered voters were reduced and added to his opponents strongholds. If this is true, then wouldn't it mean that those MPs, governors, senators etc in those affected areas were also elected "fraudulently" to use someone's word .... Now, if the whole IEBC process was "flawed", then, does it mean that we would have to repeat the whole thing again? The senators, WR, CR, governors - the whole works? Is there a possibility of other candidates coming out to claim they were also "rigged" out based on the outcome of the case? What would be the implications of only calling for presidential recounting/re-run and not the others or calling for a whole general 're-election"? Someone educate us. Hi Wendz...Good thinking. But do we close our eyes as if nothing happened and pretend all is well and move on, wait for the next election with the same faulty electronic system and ill-trained IT guys? What should we do? For me it is good to tackle these issues and even if the court sees it too expensive and time consuming they should say so but point out the key areas that need to be improved, and chief among them would be firing the whole IEBC team. They duped Kenyans. My two cents!
|
|
|
Rank: Elder Joined: 3/31/2008 Posts: 7,081 Location: Kenya
|
Wendz wrote:Magigi wrote:Bigchick wrote:Wapi wazee wa Rika ya RAO.They are letting him down.They need to meet urgently and head to RAO home for a Mzee to Mzee talk.
They should tell him anawaibisha.A man must learn to let go............there is time for everything.........A time to w ............and a time to LOOSE (LOSE).
We are wasting time and time is money his constitutional right not withstanding.
I find it strange that forever he is the one who is shortchanged. Raila represents over Five million people who voted for him. They have no problem with him having their case heard. It is not a waste time. It is a constitutional requirement/right. So let the supreme court talk and Raila and his followers will respect that. In Kenya today the law is supreme.
This, i can only hope.... I can bet all my poverty that 'he and us' will do so...Mark my words.
|
|
|
Wazua
»
Club SK
»
Politics
»
I think Raila will Drop Court Case
Forum Jump
You cannot post new topics in this forum.
You cannot reply to topics in this forum.
You cannot delete your posts in this forum.
You cannot edit your posts in this forum.
You cannot create polls in this forum.
You cannot vote in polls in this forum.
|