If CORD succeeds, we do fresh elections in 60days, not a runoff. That is my understanding of Article 140. This is because the court will be ruling on the validity of the presidential election. If invalid, fresh elections and Dida gets another chance.

true, if they determine it was invalid its a new election, it does not mention a new presidential election does that mean we go back to the 6 color coded ballots.

I pray that the Honorable Prime Minister finds peace. Losing three times can't be easy... all the time, effort and resources. May God grant you peace that surpasses all understanding.

I believe CORD has right to challenge the result. From their final release of registered voter IEBC indicated it had 14,337,399 voter now the register reads 14,352,533

(1)Guys who are asking why OAR is not conceding 'like other candidates'are being made by someone who having gotten a newspaper copy of the Katiba (the one that was inserted in the middle of the daily papers sometime in end August 2010 entitled 'free supplement') read the first page and quickly got bored. If he/she(guru am talking to you) had taken time to read the Katiba more he/she would have realised that among other things a Presidential candidate,any presidential candidate, could challenge the results of the election as provided in the Constitution. Therefore OAR has all the right to file the petition and in doing so he is just exercising that constitutional right. I found it awkward to read a statement that said that 'even his brothers in Nyanza did not support him'. Support him in doing what? Were they supposed to march to Bondo or Karen with a petition signed by a million voters saying that "we are behind you Agwambo?"
( 2)Tyranny of numbers: Another ridiculous argument is 'hata akishinda kotini fimbo ni ule ule heri tu akubali', this is meant to mean that if RAO were to win it would matter little because he would still lose by the same number or roughly the same number of votes that he lost by in this particular election. Firstly, until the Supreme Court has the opportunity to interrogate the various Form 35s and 36s, perused the contents of the ballot boxes which are disputed and pored through the affidavits in support and rival arguments then it cannot be confirmed that UK actually won with that margin or even got the requisite 50+1. But even more importantly if the Supreme Court was to order a fresh presidential election in 60days per Art. 140 (3) then the dynamics of what happened on Monday would likely change. There are no guarantees that all the people who voted for OAR would vote for him and vice versa as far as UK is concerned, there may be voter apathy and importantly some of the swing votes such as Western, NE etc may change dramatically. All this notwithstanding I still repeat that whether or not OAR would win a repeat election is immaterial, you cannot put a price on democracy. I congratulate him for preaching peace. Let now the SC determine the fate of this election. If it confirms OAR is right then let's vote again, the cost of standing in a queue should be measured against the blood shed by our freedom fighters. If the Court says UK won so let it be. He is a Kenyan. We will hold hands and engage the electoral process again after 5 years