wazua Mon, Jun 22, 2026
Welcome Guest Search | Active Topics | Log In

11 Pages«<7891011>
UHURUTO Integity hearing
Jump-steady
#81 Posted : Friday, February 15, 2013 3:35:53 PM
Rank: Veteran

Joined: 12/1/2008
Posts: 1,098
Impunity wrote:
harrydre wrote:
washiku wrote:
Ndung'u Wainaina to file a fresh petition at the Supreme Court immediately


it will be thrown out even without looking at it


Who is paying this Wainaina?
'm sure sio Tinga.


The way he is running from court to court like a headless chicken. He is obviously on someones payroll. Apparently the downpayment was given with firm instructions and an agreement that the balance will be paid only after the success of the job. smile
harrydre
#82 Posted : Friday, February 15, 2013 3:36:17 PM
Rank: Elder

Joined: 7/10/2008
Posts: 9,131
Location: Kanjo
Impunity wrote:
harrydre wrote:
washiku wrote:
Ndung'u Wainaina to file a fresh petition at the Supreme Court immediately


it will be thrown out even without looking at it


Who is paying this Wainaina?
'm sure sio Tinga.


he could be targeting few acres of land along Thika Rd. People know how to mint and print especially during an election year.
i.am.back!!!!
wa P
#83 Posted : Friday, February 15, 2013 3:38:29 PM
Rank: Member

Joined: 5/26/2009
Posts: 326
Location: Nairobi
Obi 1 Kanobi wrote:
quicksand wrote:
Foreboding precedent? Cause hiyo Chapter 6 sasa is not worth the paper its written on. Last nail driven into its coffin home and true ....


I am also extremely disappointed. So what does this chapter 6 say, my thinking is that it would apply in this UHURUTO case. We can't then claim to have a progressive constitution since in the west, anyone with the kind of personal problem that UK does would not be allowed to join the queue at a burger joint, in china they would have been hanged 1 day after waki released the envelope and in japan, he would have been required to commit sepukku to save face.


Harakirri.
In Kenya we performitto the opponent, not on oneself. Wait for March 4.
Amores
#84 Posted : Friday, February 15, 2013 3:42:56 PM
Rank: Elder

Joined: 11/25/2011
Posts: 2,103
Location: Nrb
So we have people running Amok, that chapter 6 has not been applied.
Let us be honest with ourselves,if chapter 6 were to be applied to the letter, which politician would survive?.

So if they had barred Uhuruto from running,that would have been the measure of how katiba works ?Saa zingiine tuache kujifanya.


No one is being fixed by chapter 6, tukutaneni kwa debe


Jubilee oyee !
I am happy
Lolest!
#85 Posted : Friday, February 15, 2013 4:26:39 PM
Rank: Elder

Joined: 3/18/2011
Posts: 12,069
Location: Kianjokoma
quicksand wrote:


Yes, this is exactly what I am saying ....this is the courts interpreting it. Today's decrees will enter the statute books as case law (..I think) and the cornerstones of how Chapter 6 will be interpreted from this point going forward are being laid.
Simply said - if you have not been convicted, the question of having or not having integrity, is irrelevant.

High court did not clear Uhuruto. They said that is the duty of Supreme Court, IEBC and EACC.
Laughing out loudly smile Applause d'oh! Sad Drool Liar Shame on you Pray
githundi
#86 Posted : Friday, February 15, 2013 4:40:12 PM
Rank: Veteran

Joined: 11/19/2010
Posts: 1,308
Location: nairobi metropolitan
Amores wrote:
So we have people running Amok, that chapter 6 has not been applied.
Let us be honest with ourselves,if chapter 6 were to be applied to the letter, which politician would survive?.

So if they had barred Uhuruto from running,that would have been the measure of how katiba works ?Saa zingiine tuache kujifanya.


No one is being fixed by chapter 6, tukutaneni kwa debe


Jubilee oyee !

the good thing is that the ngos have been ordered to pay costs, i doubt with that, the so called Wainaina will proceed with the case, i think it is pretty clear they don't have a chance of success.
Democracy does not belong to the dead
annsal
#87 Posted : Friday, February 15, 2013 4:44:32 PM
Rank: Member

Joined: 12/18/2009
Posts: 316
Location: nairobi
Amores wrote:
So we have people running Amok, that chapter 6 has not been applied.
Let us be honest with ourselves,if chapter 6 were to be applied to the letter, which politician would survive?.

So if they had barred Uhuruto from running,that would have been the measure of how katiba works ?Saa zingiine tuache kujifanya.


No one is being fixed by chapter 6, tukutaneni kwa debe


Jubilee oyee !


I love your enthusiasm.....unwavering..
God loves a Trier!
washiku
#88 Posted : Friday, February 15, 2013 4:47:26 PM
Rank: Chief

Joined: 5/9/2007
Posts: 13,095
Lolest! wrote:
quicksand wrote:


Yes, this is exactly what I am saying ....this is the courts interpreting it. Today's decrees will enter the statute books as case law (..I think) and the cornerstones of how Chapter 6 will be interpreted from this point going forward are being laid.
Simply said - if you have not been convicted, the question of having or not having integrity, is irrelevant.

High court did not clear Uhuruto. They said that is the duty of Supreme Court, IEBC and EACC.


That they should not do IEBC's work unless its demonstrated that IEBC is unable to do it!
quicksand
#89 Posted : Friday, February 15, 2013 4:53:13 PM
Rank: Veteran

Joined: 7/5/2010
Posts: 2,061
Location: Nairobi
Lolest! wrote:
quicksand wrote:


Yes, this is exactly what I am saying ....this is the courts interpreting it. Today's decrees will enter the statute books as case law (..I think) and the cornerstones of how Chapter 6 will be interpreted from this point going forward are being laid.
Simply said - if you have not been convicted, the question of having or not having integrity, is irrelevant.

High court did not clear Uhuruto. They said that is the duty of Supreme Court, IEBC and EACC.


True, they did not clear Uhuruto. However, they made some observations and I will quote here from the Daily Nation
Quote:

Further, the court ruled that it would be prejudicial to the rights of Mr Kenyatta's The National Alliance (TNA) and voters to bar him from contesting the presidency
The court said that while Mr Kenyatta and Mr Ruto were facing crimes against humanity charges at the International Criminal Court (ICC), they had not been convicted of any crimes
The presumption of innocence serves not only to protect the rights of the accused but to maintain public confidence in courts

I presume those pronouncements were not made in vain, that is why I referred to them as 'decrees'. A lot of legal interpretation went into their making. So, naturally in a future case someone will point at these arguments and move for dismissal. Any lawyers in the house?
Amores
#90 Posted : Friday, February 15, 2013 4:59:05 PM
Rank: Elder

Joined: 11/25/2011
Posts: 2,103
Location: Nrb
annsal wrote:
Amores wrote:
So we have people running Amok, that chapter 6 has not been applied.
Let us be honest with ourselves,if chapter 6 were to be applied to the letter, which politician would survive?.

So if they had barred Uhuruto from running,that would have been the measure of how katiba works ?Saa zingiine tuache kujifanya.


No one is being fixed by chapter 6, tukutaneni kwa debe


Jubilee oyee !


I love your enthusiasm.....unwavering..


@ annsal, ninaomba hiyo kura yako iende kwa UK.

Na @ Xtina pia ninaimba. Hi @ Xtina? smile

Kura ni Kuhesabu watu ,sio uganga
I am happy
11 Pages«<7891011>
Forum Jump  
You cannot post new topics in this forum.
You cannot reply to topics in this forum.
You cannot delete your posts in this forum.
You cannot edit your posts in this forum.
You cannot create polls in this forum.
You cannot vote in polls in this forum.

Copyright © 2026 Wazua.co.ke. All Rights Reserved.