I am not violent, i am just challenging this retrogressive thinking- that a woman is defined by the marital status.Sometimes,even with the best of intention,marriages do not work.

I also mentioned on this thread that I do not not see the same harsh judgement directed towards divorced/separated or single men when they run for political office.It is the way we are socialised,it does not mean that we have to continue embracing and thinking that way,even when we know sometimes,it just has to be that way.

What exactly are you guys arguing about ? Do you realise how far back into the dark ages you take women with your stances?

In my places of work,i have come across many women,of different statuses,and i can tell you you that their performance was never judged by the status,and they all did well,in their various roles.

Move on guys,the time to kukandamiza women i s long gone,that is why they are the ones calling shots in many enviable positions- they never let this kind retrogressive stereotyping bother them - even when they are not married or separated.

I will tell you for fact,if it were not for UK,Hon. Martha would be up there in terms of support from the backyard. Any animosity she may face right now- on the ground-has nothing to do with her status- she led Gichugu for many years.

I rest my case.

Proud someone in support of everything the gender movement represents ! Na DNA ni TNA