Wazua
»
Club SK
»
Politics
»
Who allowed 50% of the presidential candidates to be from one community? Just asking.
Rank: Member Joined: 11/24/2011 Posts: 833
|
at least on this thread there are people who watched teh same debate as me. Kamwana must be protected by all accounts, even the pontifical Muite himself, tribalism runs real deep in Kenyans. We cant help it
|
|
|
Rank: Member Joined: 2/8/2007 Posts: 808
|
Turned out to be a very dour evening! Questions were poor, shallow and very weak. I thought we were interrogating candidates on their suitability to do the work of the President, in other words past performance and future plans. I didn't here that. I would have expected the 'computer error' KKV, mahindi scams, Triton oil, Free Primary education funds, Tokyo embassy etc to feature prominently juxtaposed with the corruption discussion. Why do I think we need better interviewers as a start! Julie is not dexterous enough on political matters, she ended up cotton wooling the candidates from questions and pitfalls. It would have been interesting to have Louis Otieno and Sibi Okumu or Hassan of Citizen moderating. I feel we lost an opportunity to interview the candidates. We ended up discussing pedestrian topics and in a very cavalier manner. Surely why spend so much time on ICC and tribalism. These topics are every day fodder in the society and they will run their natural courses to the end, no point spending too much time on them.
Not looking forward to Ageyo and Udwok in the next interview they are certainly to be a humdrum pair for this type of work. The amount of flip flopping by the pair of key candidates yesterday was appalling!
|
|
|
Rank: Veteran Joined: 2/3/2010 Posts: 1,797 Location: Kenya
|
in the event of a 2nd round its very clear where many will lean I may be wrong..but then I could be right
|
|
|
Rank: Member Joined: 11/18/2010 Posts: 503 Location: Kenya
|
digitek1 wrote:in the event of a 2nd round its very clear where many will lean What do you mean? They will ask questions and answer them themselves. The second part of the interview was boring...No probing questions, no follow up questions... Would have wanted to hear Dida substantiate why he thinks lawyers are a funny bunch of guys... Something many of us have encountered with lawyers.
|
|
|
Rank: Elder Joined: 10/23/2008 Posts: 3,966
|
Kausha wrote:Turned out to be a very dour evening! Questions were poor, shallow and very weak. I thought we were interrogating candidates on their suitability to do the work of the President, in other words past performance and future plans. I didn't here that. I would have expected the 'computer error' KKV, mahindi scams, Triton oil, Free Primary education funds, Tokyo embassy etc to feature prominently juxtaposed with the corruption discussion. Why do I think we need better interviewers as a start! Julie is not dexterous enough on political matters, she ended up cotton wooling the candidates from questions and pitfalls. It would have been interesting to have Louis Otieno and Sibi Okumu or Hassan of Citizen moderating. I feel we lost an opportunity to interview the candidates. We ended up discussing pedestrian topics and in a very cavalier manner. Surely why spend so much time on ICC and tribalism. These topics are every day fodder in the society and they will run their natural courses to the end, no point spending too much time on them.
Not looking forward to Ageyo and Udwok in the next interview they are certainly to be a humdrum pair for this type of work. The amount of flip flopping by the pair of key candidates yesterday was appalling! Swali ilikuwa, who allowed 50% of the presidential candidates to be from one community. Sijui unajibu swali gani hapa. Luck is when Preparation meets Opportunity. ~ Lucius Annaeus Seneca
|
|
|
Rank: Elder Joined: 6/17/2008 Posts: 23,365 Location: Nairobi
|
....and who allowed 37.5% of the running mates to be from one tribe??? ..."Wewe ni mtu mdogo sana....na mwenye amekuandika pia ni mtu mdogo sana!".
|
|
|
Rank: Elder Joined: 6/27/2008 Posts: 4,114
|
Jus Blazin wrote:Kausha wrote:Turned out to be a very dour evening! Questions were poor, shallow and very weak. I thought we were interrogating candidates on their suitability to do the work of the President, in other words past performance and future plans. I didn't here that. I would have expected the 'computer error' KKV, mahindi scams, Triton oil, Free Primary education funds, Tokyo embassy etc to feature prominently juxtaposed with the corruption discussion. Why do I think we need better interviewers as a start! Julie is not dexterous enough on political matters, she ended up cotton wooling the candidates from questions and pitfalls. It would have been interesting to have Louis Otieno and Sibi Okumu or Hassan of Citizen moderating. I feel we lost an opportunity to interview the candidates. We ended up discussing pedestrian topics and in a very cavalier manner. Surely why spend so much time on ICC and tribalism. These topics are every day fodder in the society and they will run their natural courses to the end, no point spending too much time on them.
Not looking forward to Ageyo and Udwok in the next interview they are certainly to be a humdrum pair for this type of work. The amount of flip flopping by the pair of key candidates yesterday was appalling! Swali ilikuwa, who allowed 50% of the presidential candidates to be from one community. Sijui unajibu swali gani hapa. Are you that ignorant? Don't you know who allows ANY candidate to run? Nothing is real unless it can be named; nothing has value unless it can be sold; money is worthless unless you spend it.
|
|
|
Rank: Member Joined: 2/5/2007 Posts: 332
|
Jus Blazin wrote:Kausha wrote:Turned out to be a very dour evening! Questions were poor, shallow and very weak. I thought we were interrogating candidates on their suitability to do the work of the President, in other words past performance and future plans. I didn't here that. I would have expected the 'computer error' KKV, mahindi scams, Triton oil, Free Primary education funds, Tokyo embassy etc to feature prominently juxtaposed with the corruption discussion. Why do I think we need better interviewers as a start! Julie is not dexterous enough on political matters, she ended up cotton wooling the candidates from questions and pitfalls. It would have been interesting to have Louis Otieno and Sibi Okumu or Hassan of Citizen moderating. I feel we lost an opportunity to interview the candidates. We ended up discussing pedestrian topics and in a very cavalier manner. Surely why spend so much time on ICC and tribalism. These topics are every day fodder in the society and they will run their natural courses to the end, no point spending too much time on them.
Not looking forward to Ageyo and Udwok in the next interview they are certainly to be a humdrum pair for this type of work. The amount of flip flopping by the pair of key candidates yesterday was appalling! Swali ilikuwa, who allowed 50% of the presidential candidates to be from one community. Sijui unajibu swali gani hapa. Huyu ni kamam mwalimu Dida!
|
|
|
Rank: Elder Joined: 10/14/2009 Posts: 2,057
|
mukiha wrote:Jus Blazin wrote:Kausha wrote:Turned out to be a very dour evening! Questions were poor, shallow and very weak. I thought we were interrogating candidates on their suitability to do the work of the President, in other words past performance and future plans. I didn't here that. I would have expected the 'computer error' KKV, mahindi scams, Triton oil, Free Primary education funds, Tokyo embassy etc to feature prominently juxtaposed with the corruption discussion. Why do I think we need better interviewers as a start! Julie is not dexterous enough on political matters, she ended up cotton wooling the candidates from questions and pitfalls. It would have been interesting to have Louis Otieno and Sibi Okumu or Hassan of Citizen moderating. I feel we lost an opportunity to interview the candidates. We ended up discussing pedestrian topics and in a very cavalier manner. Surely why spend so much time on ICC and tribalism. These topics are every day fodder in the society and they will run their natural courses to the end, no point spending too much time on them.
Not looking forward to Ageyo and Udwok in the next interview they are certainly to be a humdrum pair for this type of work. The amount of flip flopping by the pair of key candidates yesterday was appalling! Swali ilikuwa, who allowed 50% of the presidential candidates to be from one community. Sijui unajibu swali gani hapa. Are you that ignorant? Don't you know who allows ANY candidate to run? kuna watu hapa wakipatana in a dark alley .... Wacha tu ! If you are an eagle don't hang around with chickens; chickens don't fly....
|
|
|
Rank: Veteran Joined: 11/17/2009 Posts: 2,040 Location: GA
|
Organisers now say only 3 for the next debate probably MDVD OAR and UK
|
|
|
Wazua
»
Club SK
»
Politics
»
Who allowed 50% of the presidential candidates to be from one community? Just asking.
Forum Jump
You cannot post new topics in this forum.
You cannot reply to topics in this forum.
You cannot delete your posts in this forum.
You cannot edit your posts in this forum.
You cannot create polls in this forum.
You cannot vote in polls in this forum.
|