Wazua
»
Club SK
»
Culture
»
philosophy
Rank: Elder Joined: 3/2/2007 Posts: 8,776 Location: Cameroon
|
ChessMaster wrote:simonkabz wrote:Impunity wrote:ChessMaster wrote:tycho wrote:ChessMaster wrote:Subject or topic is simply the object being studied.
It applies to all attempts to establish the truth. Because unless the truth is established everything else is just opinion based on perception. The subject, is in fact, an object? Meaning, existing seperately and independent of the philosopher, and his intentions? Not always because the philosopher could be his own object.The study of self. Where is this discussion heading to?  Let me ask on your behalf, is there any philosophy in matters airport? Hahaha.What is your take on matters airport? Freud was a psychologist particularly interested in all matters airport. Lol! Sigmund was a nut case. Most of his theories were related to one airport matter or the other. Oedipus Complex was the ultimate bomb. TULIA.........UFUNZWE!
|
|
|
Rank: Elder Joined: 2/23/2009 Posts: 1,626
|
simonkabz wrote:ChessMaster wrote:simonkabz wrote:Impunity wrote:ChessMaster wrote:tycho wrote:ChessMaster wrote:Subject or topic is simply the object being studied.
It applies to all attempts to establish the truth. Because unless the truth is established everything else is just opinion based on perception. The subject, is in fact, an object? Meaning, existing seperately and independent of the philosopher, and his intentions? Not always because the philosopher could be his own object.The study of self. Where is this discussion heading to? Let me ask on your behalf, is there any philosophy in matters airport? Hahaha.What is your take on matters airport? Freud was a psychologist particularly interested in all matters airport. Lol! Sigmund was a nut case. Most of his theories were related to one airport matter or the other. Oedipus Complex was the ultimate bomb. Landing was always on his mind.Btw do you know he was the uncle of the father of P.R,Edward Barneys who actually used Freud's theories in an exceptional way. But I think some of his theories were sound but interpreted wrongly even though he put it wrongly. For example,Oedipus complex.In my view,people will either date someone like their mother figure or the opposite the mother figure. What do you think? Uncertainty is certain.Let go
|
|
|
Rank: Elder Joined: 1/27/2011 Posts: 1,777
|
ChessMaster wrote:@josiah33 - I agree. Time is not a independent quantity but measured using space.Its a utility. But I disagree with psychological time. The mind has no time you can think of the past,present or future at any moment but present captures your attention I think you didn't read this part: Linear time “past- present-future” is psychological time. Physical time is run of clocks in
a space. Motion that we experience through psychological time happens in space that is
timeless; past, present and future do not exist in space. The past, present and future we experience through 'psychological time' or rather our perception of time happens in space that is timeless.
|
|
|
Rank: Elder Joined: 3/2/2007 Posts: 8,776 Location: Cameroon
|
ChessMaster wrote:simonkabz wrote:ChessMaster wrote:simonkabz wrote:Impunity wrote:ChessMaster wrote:tycho wrote:ChessMaster wrote:Subject or topic is simply the object being studied.
It applies to all attempts to establish the truth. Because unless the truth is established everything else is just opinion based on perception. The subject, is in fact, an object? Meaning, existing seperately and independent of the philosopher, and his intentions? Not always because the philosopher could be his own object.The study of self. Where is this discussion heading to? Let me ask on your behalf, is there any philosophy in matters airport? Hahaha.What is your take on matters airport? Freud was a psychologist particularly interested in all matters airport. Lol! Sigmund was a nut case. Most of his theories were related to one airport matter or the other. Oedipus Complex was the ultimate bomb. Landing was always on his mind.Btw do you know he was the uncle of the father of P.R,Edward Barneys who actually used Freud's theories in an exceptional way. But I think some of his theories were sound but interpreted wrongly even though he put it wrongly. For example,Oedipus complex.In my view,people will either date someone like their mother figure or the opposite the mother figure. What do you think? weee chessman, usianze kuniuliza maswali ngumu nikiwa hungover namna this. Labda ubonge kuhusu philosophy ya ma tusker na kwanini wanaume wanajiumizaga na hangi. TULIA.........UFUNZWE!
|
|
|
Rank: Elder Joined: 2/23/2009 Posts: 1,626
|
josiah33 wrote:ChessMaster wrote:@josiah33 - I agree. Time is not a independent quantity but measured using space.Its a utility. But I disagree with psychological time. The mind has no time you can think of the past,present or future at any moment but present captures your attention I think you didn't read this part: Linear time “past- present-future” is psychological time. Physical time is run of clocks in
a space. Motion that we experience through psychological time happens in space that is
timeless; past, present and future do not exist in space. The past, present and future we experience through 'psychological time' or rather our perception of time happens in space that is timeless. Psychological time is a creation of our own minds. It doesn't really exist. Time in space does exist,when something changes from one state to another,that is time.Without time,space would be constant. @simonkabz - Me I do it for a break.There are days I just need to relax my mind and make a few mistakes. Uncertainty is certain.Let go
|
|
|
Rank: Elder Joined: 7/1/2011 Posts: 8,804 Location: Nairobi
|
Landing is a very serious matter.
|
|
|
Rank: Elder Joined: 7/1/2011 Posts: 8,804 Location: Nairobi
|
ChessMaster wrote:josiah33 wrote:ChessMaster wrote:@josiah33 - I agree. Time is not a independent quantity but measured using space.Its a utility. But I disagree with psychological time. The mind has no time you can think of the past,present or future at any moment but present captures your attention I think you didn't read this part: Linear time “past- present-future” is psychological time. Physical time is run of clocks in
a space. Motion that we experience through psychological time happens in space that is
timeless; past, present and future do not exist in space. The past, present and future we experience through 'psychological time' or rather our perception of time happens in space that is timeless. Psychological time is a creation of our own minds. It doesn't really exist. Time in space does exist,when something changes from one state to another,that is time.Without time,space would be constant. @simonkabz - Me I do it for a break.There are days I just need to relax my mind and make a few mistakes. The mind exists.
|
|
|
Rank: Elder Joined: 2/23/2009 Posts: 1,626
|
tycho wrote:ChessMaster wrote:josiah33 wrote:ChessMaster wrote:@josiah33 - I agree. Time is not a independent quantity but measured using space.Its a utility. But I disagree with psychological time. The mind has no time you can think of the past,present or future at any moment but present captures your attention I think you didn't read this part: Linear time “past- present-future” is psychological time. Physical time is run of clocks in
a space. Motion that we experience through psychological time happens in space that is
timeless; past, present and future do not exist in space. The past, present and future we experience through 'psychological time' or rather our perception of time happens in space that is timeless. Psychological time is a creation of our own minds. It doesn't really exist. Time in space does exist,when something changes from one state to another,that is time.Without time,space would be constant. @simonkabz - Me I do it for a break.There are days I just need to relax my mind and make a few mistakes. The mind exists. I think it does but I have no clue what it is. Uncertainty is certain.Let go
|
|
|
Rank: Elder Joined: 1/27/2011 Posts: 1,777
|
ChessMaster wrote:josiah33 wrote:ChessMaster wrote:@josiah33 - I agree. Time is not a independent quantity but measured using space.Its a utility. But I disagree with psychological time. The mind has no time you can think of the past,present or future at any moment but present captures your attention I think you didn't read this part: Linear time “past- present-future” is psychological time. Physical time is run of clocks in
a space. Motion that we experience through psychological time happens in space that is
timeless; past, present and future do not exist in space. The past, present and future we experience through 'psychological time' or rather our perception of time happens in space that is timeless. Psychological time is a creation of our own minds. It doesn't really exist. Time in space does exist,when something changes from one state to another,that is time.Without time,space would be constant. Mind is creating time;
consciousness has ability to watch time as a mind model. Time is a model of
the mind, mind is temporal, consciousness is atemporal.
Human conviction that with clocks one measures time cannot be
proved by an experiment, as time cannot be observed by senses (sight).
Human senses confirm that with clocks one measures duration, speed and
numerical order of material changes that run into physical space. The
smallest unit of duration and numerical order of material changes is Planck
time, the largest is light year. Material changes itself have no duration, they
only a have numerical order. A scientist gives material changes duration by
measuring them with clocks; time is an epiphenomenon of the measured
duration of material change. Time does not run into universe on its own.
Universe is an atemporal phenomenon (1,2,3). One has to distinguish
between motion and time. Motion of material objects happens in space only,
and time is a scientific tool that allows us to experience motion in the linear
sense “past-present-future”. One has to be aware that “past-present-future”
are human inventions, that there is no time in the universe as we experience it. With our senses we can observe only motion in space. This
motion we are experiencing in time is a mind model.
Albert Einstein was right by saying: »Space and time are modes by which
we think, not conditions under which we live«. Time -- the time that we
know through clocks and calendars -- was invented.
The idea of Atemporal Universe is upgrading the Theory of Relativity in a
sense that space-time is merely a mathematical model used in science to
describe material change running into physical space that itself is
atemporal. Time does not run into space on its own. Material change runs
into atemporal space.
|
|
|
Rank: Elder Joined: 2/23/2009 Posts: 1,626
|
@josiah33 - I think we are in agreement. Because what you've said is how I'm thinking about it. Now let me ask you a question,if time doesn't exist,define beginning. Uncertainty is certain.Let go
|
|
|
Wazua
»
Club SK
»
Culture
»
philosophy
Forum Jump
You cannot post new topics in this forum.
You cannot reply to topics in this forum.
You cannot delete your posts in this forum.
You cannot edit your posts in this forum.
You cannot create polls in this forum.
You cannot vote in polls in this forum.
|