I think Palme acted irrationally. - That the ILO awarded her damages was only because her dismisal did not follow the rebutal procedures which are very strict and straighforward in the entire UN system regardless of how senior or junior the grieving employee is.

The 2005 case by the South African journalist was very weak and in my view a plan to bring down Ocampo.

She argued that Ocampo had taken her car keys and that she had to go to the hotel,sleep with him first before Ocampo could give back the keys.

Picture this and see the big lie.

Why didn't she report the incident to the police or take a cab home.

The case was so weak with no slight evidence and was thrown out at first hearing.

Besides ICC is an institution,unlike PEV & crimes against humanity which can only be associated with individuals with a face. So even if your edge out Ocampo,ICC remains at the same spot.

By the way,this story is doing rounds on Sudanese websites but will not stop the Hague train from pulling up in Kenya. Sorry!





Everyday!

'to take advantage of the situation after the interview.'

The interpretation of this statement is VERY key.

They main purpose of their meeting was the interview and therefore official jurisdiction ended at 'I am .....,for SABC,Jo'Burg,RSA.'

She could have decided to show Ocampo,the true SA cat and this can only be attributed to the guys abilities after hours.

If they went to a bar,the little jogoo tends to stand anyway 'on sight...of certain...which some SA chicks are well endowed with. OK OK even Kenyan Chicks'. The guy could have tapped it consentiously,mutually,etc.

Watu waende hague.

haiya! na kutaendaje?

gunna 4lyf