Jamani wrote:
I just call it a comment not political interference or political influence....
and what if from the same politician the comment has legal sound bases and the judge rules using the same legal bases what will you call it? Look at the MRC cases, Embakasi Mp case, Kibs cases where he has appointed without regard of the law, politicians made comments would you say the courts ruled based on political influence or the law?
Does it mean that if a political makes a comment on any legal matter then its political interference? do you imply that the judge made his ruling based on the comment and not legal facts?
Agreed, I may have been to fast on that one, but I can imagine how all that follows will play out after their reinstatement. I really pity the shareholders for NK's gambling move.
Pesa Nane wrote:
I guess luggage

my bad, that just proves my mother tongue isn't English.
Impunity wrote:
You had to bring UK into this, hope someone will not bring OAR too!
Err too late!..hehe That's what politics is about.. Politicians!
dunkang wrote:
So, @Impunity, which politician is been refered to by @drobos that he manipulated the court?
Okay let me not ride on hearsay at this point and leave things to unravel.
maka wrote:@Drobos fly do you want to bet?The MD erred big time and he knows that he is so full of himself,why are other workers retrenched yet they dont go to court?simple reason the management engages with them until they reach an amicable solution,TN and his management dint,they did not iron out the differences that were their between them and the workers...I have the judgment with me 65 pages of it kindly take time and read it and get what Rika.J said...by the way how can I post it on that wazua google group things everyone can read
Go to
https://groups.google.com/forum/#!forum/wazua
and join the relevant group and post it, I would also like to see it too. This should save everyone the inconvenience of posting their emails here