RDM has been sacked by Chelsea!

http://www1.skysports.com/football/

[quote=TAZ]RDM has been sacked by Chelsea!

http://www1.skysports.com/football/[/quote]
Roman needs help. "London's" burning! "London's" burning! "London's" burning! Fire! Fire!
Pep, as explained by TAZ,on a second thought, he might take up the job. My wonder is, if the guy who got Roman UCL after over 8 yrs of trying didn't get mercy,faith nor patience from the Russian, will Pep get any of it?

I would guess RDM is still in Italy,no need rushing back to London,aende kasalimie wadhii mtaani.

Pep has reportedly decided against moving to Stamford Bridge before the end of the season so i guess its down to Benitez or "Arry.

Abramovich should just appoint himself the new Chelsea Manager for LIFE!!!!!!

The axe has fallen...sooner than we all thought

http://soccernet.espn.go...atteo-departure?cc=3888

Hacheni wivu.... that guy has overstayed!!!!

At 262 days in charge, Di Matteo lasted longer than previous Abramovich managers Villas-Boas (256), Avram Grant (247) and Luiz Felipe Scolari (223).

RDM 262 days, AVB 257days, Scholari 244 days......SAF 26yrs and counting!!!

Benitez has already declared his interest in the Chelsea job. Perhapas AVB thinks he can get Torres firing again.

ION.....It seems Chelsea are trying to get Drogba on loan during his off-season. Henry also wants another short term loan at Arsenal in January.

http://www.goal.com/en-k...eserves-recognition-not

C&P:

"Under Abramovich, Chelsea have ascended to the top of the English and European game, at the cost of all credibility and integrity. They have spent ludicrous sums, sacked managers on an almost yearly basis, alienated club legends such as Steve Clarke and Ray Wilkins, and kept a man found guilty of racist abuse as their captain because he is still a valuable ‘asset’. At some point, every discerning follower of this club must have asked themselves: “Is it worth it?”

The anger of Blues fans towards their owner will always be tempered by a feeling of intense gratitude. Had Abramovich elected to buy Tottenham back in 2003, Chelsea would almost certainly have been consumed by their crippling debts in the manner of Leeds United, becoming yet another cautionary tale for chairmen willing to live the dream with somebody else’s money.

Unlike his many managers Abramovich is accountable to no one. He will never take responsibility for the vain purchases of Andriy Shevchenko and Fernando Torres which have made Chelsea a laughing stock in the transfer market, nor the decisions to employ Luiz Felipe Scolari or Avram Grant, or to invest almost £30m in Andre Villas-Boas on the strength of one excellent season at Porto.

But then, he has earned the right not to be – not only as a result of some £1bn of investment, but also because he has brought an amount of silverware to Stamford Bridge unprecedented in the club’s 108 years of history. There remains the nagging sense that Chelsea would have achieved even more without this now infamous ‘sacking model’, but we can only remark on what is, not what might have been."

Truly 2 sides of a coin