Baraza since her suspension has been receiving half her salary meaning she has earned approximately 3.8 million.When a judicial officer with security of tenure such as Baraza resigns that officer is entitled to an amount equivalent to the balance of the sum that would have accrued during the tenure,Baraza was to retire by effluxion of time at the age of 70.She is now 55 so that means she had 15 more years till she attained the constitutional age of 70.At an average pay of 1million every month,her take home would have been at least 180 million over 15 years.If you add cumulative benefits we are talking of about 200 million which she is entitled to receive at a go.There is legal support for this see:Navichandra Shah vs Premier Academy.The JSC act can be interpreted differently.They,ll have to reach a compromise at some point in time.

If this is true it would have been cheaper to live with her. The next C
Deputy CJ will also be drawing a salary. Pretty expensive.

The tribunal investigating her conduct recommended her removal. The only thing that stopped the president from removing her was the stay when she was appealing the same which she has since withdrawn. In my view she had no capacity to resign.
And I don't understand this argument that when a constitutional office holder with a security of tenure resigns she/he is entitled to salary for the whole term. Sounds like conventional wisdom.
Security of tenure protects ones removal from employment by third parties before the expiry of the tenure. It does not protect a removal by own self so to say. Thus when one resigns I am yet to see a good argument for giving her/him salary for the unserved term - in fact if the resignation is without notice a case could be made for payment by the employee for the noice period.

She should not be paid even a south sudanese dime!

There is a difference between a protected Constitutional office and a normal contract of employment. Firstly examples abound of judges and constitutional office holders who were paid for the remainder of their term. Justice Ringera is one PLO is another the judges sent packing after the radical surgery are another lot. It is fallacious to suggest that since she resigned during the pendency of the appeal and within the statutory 14 day leave period she will not be entitled to her dues. The JSC Act 2011 is clear she still retained her post as Deputy CJ the President did not get the chance to terminate her, she resigned of her own volition and thus as per the Constitution her terms cannot be varied to her disadvantage