wazua Mon, Mar 30, 2026
Welcome Guest Search | Active Topics | Log In

259 Pages«<135136137138139>»
KENOL KOBIL .... 2012
yaserbigchair
#1361 Posted : Monday, July 09, 2012 9:17:37 AM
Rank: Member

Joined: 7/19/2006
Posts: 118
Location: Mombasa
@Jamani... and do you know of the MANDATORY GENERAL OFFER???

KK told its Partners and Shareholders that Puma Energy plans to buy off the minority shareholder through this arrangement.

I am telling you,the price I see it through.
Sound that I love most: Is the ringing bell of Stock Market.
mwekez@ji
#1362 Posted : Monday, July 09, 2012 9:29:43 AM
Rank: Chief

Joined: 5/31/2011
Posts: 5,121
PKoli wrote:
VituVingiSana wrote:
Nothing new in the article. It is poorly written & just done to fill space & sell more copies! The 70% s/holders will 'cede' [which could be sell or get a piece of Puma] their shares to Puma. It is all good as long as the 30% get a fair price!


BD needs to hire business writers or retrain those they have. As VVS says, the article has nothing new.


Give credit where credit is due!

When did you people know that those who have already agreed cede their shares own 70%?

There is also the controversial matter that is also brought out by @yaserbigchair that "minority shareholders would have no option but to sell their stakes at an agreed price"
youcan'tstopusnow
#1363 Posted : Monday, July 09, 2012 9:54:46 AM
Rank: Chief

Joined: 3/24/2010
Posts: 6,779
Location: Black Africa
Mandatory general offer means that PUMA has to make a bid for the rest of the shares (as a matter of law) UNLESS they apply for an exemption to this rule.

It does not mean people will be forced to sell their shares. I once posted a case study of East African Packaging Industries on this thread
GOD BLESS YOUR LIFE
VituVingiSana
#1364 Posted : Monday, July 09, 2012 10:00:00 AM
Rank: Chief

Joined: 1/3/2007
Posts: 18,361
Location: Nairobi
youcan'tstopusnow wrote:
Mandatory general offer means that PUMA has to make a bid for the rest of the shares (as a matter of law) UNLESS they apply for an exemption to this rule.

It does not mean people will be forced to sell their shares. I once posted a case study of East African Packaging Industries on this thread
Same as Unilever Tea. There are some s/holders who still own Unilever Tea shares.
Greedy when others are fearful. Very fearful when others are greedy - to paraphrase Warren Buffett
Aguytrying
#1365 Posted : Monday, July 09, 2012 10:16:31 AM
Rank: Elder

Joined: 7/11/2010
Posts: 5,040
@yaser.
What is your motive in coming here everyday and telling us the price will be lower than 20/-?
We already know that it is a possibility. Unless you have concrete info i suggest you stop posting the same thing here everyday.
Broker's advice are among the most unreliable.

like cde says, just wait for the confirmation price all this speculation is useless.
The investor's chief problem - and even his worst enemy - is likely to be himself
kenmac
#1366 Posted : Monday, July 09, 2012 7:58:44 PM
Rank: Elder

Joined: 5/26/2009
Posts: 1,793
new development on workers case
http://www.businessdaily...38/-/p0q3x8/-/index.html
......Ecclesiastes
guru267
#1367 Posted : Monday, July 09, 2012 8:31:09 PM
Rank: Elder

Joined: 1/21/2010
Posts: 6,675
Location: Nairobi
youcan'tstopusnow wrote:
Mandatory general offer means that PUMA has to make a bid for the rest of the shares (as a matter of law) UNLESS they apply for an exemption to this rule.

It does not mean people will be forced to sell their shares. I once posted a case study of East African Packaging Industries on this thread


@youcant THANK YOU for explaining to that prick what a mandatory offer is!!!
Mark 12:29
Deuteronomy 4:16
Aguytrying
#1368 Posted : Monday, July 09, 2012 8:50:03 PM
Rank: Elder

Joined: 7/11/2010
Posts: 5,040
[quote=kenmac]new development on workers case
http://www.businessdaily...8/-/p0q3x8/-/index.html[/quote]

Old news
The investor's chief problem - and even his worst enemy - is likely to be himself
Aguytrying
#1369 Posted : Monday, July 09, 2012 8:51:50 PM
Rank: Elder

Joined: 7/11/2010
Posts: 5,040
guru267 wrote:
youcan'tstopusnow wrote:
Mandatory general offer means that PUMA has to make a bid for the rest of the shares (as a matter of law) UNLESS they apply for an exemption to this rule.

It does not mean people will be forced to sell their shares. I once posted a case study of East African Packaging Industries on this thread


@youcant THANK YOU for explaining to that prick what a mandatory offer is!!!


This guy and another guys posts(name with held) really irritate me, due to the severe lack of intelligence
The investor's chief problem - and even his worst enemy - is likely to be himself
kenmac
#1370 Posted : Monday, July 09, 2012 9:36:24 PM
Rank: Elder

Joined: 5/26/2009
Posts: 1,793
Aguytrying wrote:
[quote=kenmac]new development on workers case
http://www.businessdaily...8/-/p0q3x8/-/index.html[/quote]

Old news



You must have written it:

Kenol/Kobil filling station. Photo/FILE
By BENSON WAMBUGU ( email the
author )
Posted Sunday, July 8 2012 at 17:06
......Ecclesiastes
259 Pages«<135136137138139>»
Forum Jump  
You cannot post new topics in this forum.
You cannot reply to topics in this forum.
You cannot delete your posts in this forum.
You cannot edit your posts in this forum.
You cannot create polls in this forum.
You cannot vote in polls in this forum.

Copyright © 2026 Wazua.co.ke. All Rights Reserved.