Aguytrying wrote:Jamani wrote:Aguytrying wrote:guru267 wrote:@aguytrying
Some investors may want to own the privately owned puma subsidiary.. Also some shareholders may not want to wait until the take over is complete..
There you have it! willing buyer willing seller!!
true on both counts. but both decisions not wise
Please explain the lack of wisdom on both?
being a shareholder of a private company as a minority has its challenges and risks thats why. purely personal opinion.
to answer above if takeover dont go through: suspension lifted then status quo as before.
The ultimate decision is yours
Are takeover offers good for shareholders? The answer is sometimes yes and sometime no. Remember, you might have bought the shares with the intention of holding them for the long term, hoping to benefit from the long-term growth in the value of the business.
Accepting a takeover offer now means that you will sacrifice long-term gain for an immediate payment. This may be good if you can find a better home for your money but will be bad if you cannot find as good an investment to replace this one.