Wazua
»
Club SK
»
Politics
»
ICC Verdict: Kenya case confirms 4 of Ocampo 6
Rank: Elder Joined: 6/17/2008 Posts: 23,365 Location: Nairobi
|
...and that write up about how the mungiki has evolved also played a role in his confirmation!!!! ..."Wewe ni mtu mdogo sana....na mwenye amekuandika pia ni mtu mdogo sana!".
|
|
|
Rank: User Joined: 11/10/2010 Posts: 550 Location: Junction
|
Impunity must end by all means necessary. We need to be able to remember the past for better and informed arguments. December 27, 2007 General elections take place in Kenya. December 30, 2007 Incumbent President Mwai Kibaki of the PNU is declared the winner of the general elections, though his ‘victory’ over opposition candidate Raila Odinga of the ODM amidst allegations of election fraud on both sides triggering outbreaks of violence. February 5, 2008 The International Criminal Court Prosecutor says his office has begun a preliminary examination of the post-election violence in Kenya. February 28, 2008 A mediation team, led by former UN Secretary-General Kofi Annan, oversees the signing of a power-sharing agreement called the National Accord and Reconciliation Act, which establishes a coalition government with Kibaki as president and Odinga as prime minister. It also set up the Commission of Inquiry on Post-Election Violence (CIPEV), which later became known as the Waki Commission after its chair, Judge Philip Waki. October 15, 2008 The Waki Commission submits its report and recommendations to the government of Kenya; recommendations include the establishment of a special tribunal of national and international judges to investigate and prosecute perpetrators of the post-election violence. The report also states that if the tribunal is not set up within six months, information collected by the Waki Commission will be passed to the ICC, including a sealed envelope of names of those suspected to be most responsible for the violence. February 12, 2009 The Kenyan parliament votes against the establishment of the proposed tribunal made up of Kenyan and international judges to address the post-election violence. July 3, 2009 Three Kenyan Cabinet ministers sign an agreement with the ICC committing Kenya to establish a credible and independent tribunal to try perpetrators of post-election violence by August. July 16, 2009 The Prosecutor is sent six boxes containing documents and supporting materials compiled by the Waki Commission during its investigations. The documentation includes a sealed envelope that contains a list of suspects identified by the Waki Commission as those most responsible for the violence. November 9, 2009 Parliament begins debate on another constitutional amendment to form a local tribunal. To date that debate has not concluded. November 26, 2009 ICC Prosecutor Luis Moreno-Ocampo files a request seeking authorization from Pre-Trial Chamber II to open an investigation in relation to the crimes allegedly committed during the 2007-2008 post-election violence in Kenya. March 31, 2010 Pre-Trial Chamber II issues its majority decision (2-1) that there is a reasonable basis to proceed with an investigation into the situation in Kenya in relation to crimes against humanity within the jurisdiction of the Court committed between June 1, 2005 and November 26, 2009. December 15, 2010 The ICC Prosecutor requests the issuance of ‘summonses to appear’ for six people in the court’s Kenya investigation – William Samoei Ruto, Henry Kiprono Kosgey, Joshua Arap Sang (case one) and Francis Kirimi Muthaura, Uhuru Muigai Kenyatta, and Mohamed Hussein Ali (case two) – for their alleged responsibility in the commission of crimes against humanity. March 8, 2011 Pre-Trial Chamber II issues the summonses to appear for the aforementioned six individuals, as it finds reasonable grounds to believe that they committed the crimes alleged by the Prosecutor. March 31, 2011 Kenyan government files an application challenging the ICC’s jurisdiction over the cases. April 7, 2011 The first three defendants (Ruto, Kosgey, and Sang) made their initial appearance before the Court in The Hague. April 8, 2011 The second three defendants (Muthaura, Kenyatta, and Ali) made their initial appearance before the Court in The Hague. September 1, 2011 Confirmation of charges hearing began for the first three defendants (Ruto, Kosgey, and Sang). September 8, 2011 Confirmation of charges hearing concluded for the first three defendants. September 21, 2011 Confirmation of charges hearing began for the second three defendants (Muthaura, Kenyatta, and Ali). October 5, 2011 Confirmation of charges hearing concluded for the second three defendants. January 23, 2012 Pre-Trial Chamber II confirms charges against Ruto, Sang, Muthaura, and Kenyatta. Charges against Ali and Kosgey are rejected. By inference, the man is all that Mr Phantom is not: an untrustworthy radical, divisive, too many enemies, a dictator, and a persistent liar...Gaitho dialogues.
|
|
|
Rank: Member Joined: 5/13/2008 Posts: 558
|
The Kenyan parliament votes against the establishment of the proposed tribunal made up of Kenyan and international judges to address the post-election violence.
July 3, 2009
Who exactly voted against the establishment of a local tribunal?.
They are:
Among those who voted against a local tribunal are listed as the following: Chepchumba, Cheruiyot, Ethuro, Gaichuchie, Gitau, Jirongo, Kaino, Kaloki, Kamau JI, Kamau J M, Kambi, Kapondi, Kariuki, Kathuri, Kigen, Kiilu, Kilonzo J K, Kilonzo J M, Kiuna, Kivuti, Koech, Konchela, Dr Kones, Mrs Kones, Kuttuny, Lagat, Langat, Lessonet, Letimalo, Linturi, Litole, M’Mithiaru, Machage, Magerer, Mbau, Mbugwa, Mututho, Mung’aro, Munyaka, Muoki I.M, Muoki D M, Mureithi, Murgor, Musyimi, Mwangi, Mwathi, Mwiru, Nguiyai, Njuguna, Onyancha, Ottichilo, Ruto, Sambu, Sirma, Waibara, Waititu, Wambugu, Washiali, Were, Yakub.
These are the fellows who should be blamed for shaming kenyans on the international stage. My guess is that at the time of voting they were very short sighted to take into consinderation the long term consequencies.
Maybe some of them thought Raila was in the box.
|
|
|
Rank: Veteran Joined: 6/8/2010 Posts: 1,732
|
What is ICC fearing that if Uhuru and Uthaura shoul not be heard orally. Anybody can write a composition and earn marks but that does not mean they are good in elaborating the truth orally. We need to hear this thing live and not what was written when things were totally political http://www.nation.co.ke/...0/-/sjexxmz/-/index.htmlLife is an endless adventure
|
|
|
Rank: Elder Joined: 3/2/2009 Posts: 26,330 Location: Masada
|
Jaina wrote:The Kenyan parliament votes against the establishment of the proposed tribunal made up of Kenyan and international judges to address the post-election violence.
July 3, 2009
Who exactly voted against the establishment of a local tribunal?.
They are:
Among those who voted against a local tribunal are listed as the following: Chepchumba, Cheruiyot, Ethuro, Gaichuchie, Gitau, Jirongo, Kaino, Kaloki, Kamau JI, Kamau J M, Kambi, Kapondi, Kariuki, Kathuri, Kigen, Kiilu, Kilonzo J K, Kilonzo J M, Kiuna, Kivuti, Koech, Konchela, Dr Kones, Mrs Kones, Kuttuny, Lagat, Langat, Lessonet, Letimalo, Linturi, Litole, M’Mithiaru, Machage, Magerer, Mbau, Mbugwa, Mututho, Mung’aro, Munyaka, Muoki I.M, Muoki D M, Mureithi, Murgor, Musyimi, Mwangi, Mwathi, Mwiru, Nguiyai, Njuguna, Onyancha, Ottichilo, Ruto, Sambu, Sirma, Waibara, Waititu, Wambugu, Washiali, Were, Yakub.
These are the fellows who should be blamed for shaming kenyans on the international stage. My guess is that at the time of voting they were very short sighted to take into consinderation the long term consequencies.
Maybe some of them thought Raila was in the box.
Is above the Ruto of the movie-fame or the Chepalungu one?  Portfolio: Sold
You know you've made it when you get a parking space for your yatcht.
|
|
|
Rank: Elder Joined: 8/11/2010 Posts: 1,588
|
[quote=freiks]What is ICC fearing that if Uhuru and Uthaura shoul not be heard orally. Anybody can write a composition and earn marks but that does not mean they are good in elaborating the truth orally. We need to hear this thing live and not what was written when things were totally political http://www.nation.co.ke/.../-/sjexxmz/-/index.html[/quote] So they have been given the chance to write those compositions and earn their marks. What do you want?
|
|
|
Rank: Veteran Joined: 6/8/2010 Posts: 1,732
|
The courts rejects Muthaura request. http://www.nation.co.ke/...6/-/ppbpps/-/index.html
May be i tend to believe now more than before that this case is already pre-determine. The 4 should just go and ask how many years they will be jailed and start the jail term all together Life is an endless adventure
|
|
|
Wazua
»
Club SK
»
Politics
»
ICC Verdict: Kenya case confirms 4 of Ocampo 6
Forum Jump
You cannot post new topics in this forum.
You cannot reply to topics in this forum.
You cannot delete your posts in this forum.
You cannot edit your posts in this forum.
You cannot create polls in this forum.
You cannot vote in polls in this forum.
|