Allow me to post one of the answers from ICT Board
[The idea of a new city and in this case a tech city in Kenya, adjacent to the capital might seem like overkill, if not unwise. It is always prudent, certainly economical and plausible to start with a small initiative and then mushroom according developments and growth that come along. However, you would have to know the conditions and the true criteria surrounding this new city as to see the motivation.
The new city proposal in many respects is 'killing two birds with one stone'. Nairobi the capital is experiencing tremendous growth and its truly busting out of its seams. The population in that city is becoming a greater concern on a daily basis. The morning and afternoon commute average 2 if not 3 hrs each. Anybody in the U.S, particularly the eastern seaboard, is aware that a two hour journey will usually take you to another city if not state; a distance of about 100 miles give or take. The 2 hr commutes are movements from residences to work places usually 16 to 32 km or 10 to 20 miles. Traffic is horrendous.
The government is currently expanding on roads and perhaps new transport initiatives. The public transport system has been alive and kicking since the beginning. Perhaps a new shuttle or rail system might alleviate the issue. The underlying problem is that Nairobi host about 3 million residents with an annual growth of 4 to 5% all occupying a 685 km^2 area. Its not complicated then to understand that capital city as it stands will soon be inept to carter for its masses unless something is done. This new city is thus a solution to population growth.
Now technology, education, youth, entrepreneurship and zeal are lending to the second and more exciting venture for the new city. Kenya hosts a burgeoning technical community as can be observed at
http://www.ihub.co.ke . The start ups and ventures that are sprouting all over the city, and the access to new telecommunications and computing technology is evidence of an eager and educated young population, though concentrated in and around the city limits. The scale is nowhere near Silicon Valley, but surely the two cannot be compared.
While silicon Valley pioneered several innovations and the growth of IT, Kenya is at a juncture where it is assimilating all this technology and knowledge, using it and developing organic solutions to its own issues and transcending them to the globe, e.g Ushahidi. Konza City, hence can be compared to HITEC city in Hyderabad, India. So not only is the new city a population solution it has a purpose of harnessing the nations technological resources.
Now if you took the time to analyze the governments plans for the new city (www.konzacity.co.ke), it would be clear that there will be foundations and phased construction of the city. It can be expected that after the city foundations (infrastructure and amenities) and the first phases have been laid, occupation will commence, allowing for a start in ROI. You can expect adjustments to come about as a result of accommodating new residents.
The barrier that Kenya as a whole would have to overcome is the ever surrounding and infiltrating society 'impoverisher' known as graft. Right now this idea is observed with beloved curiosity, yet history won't allow us to hold our breath. Kenyans will have to call upon and really demand accountability. It will be incredibly sad if this project is marred with corruption and swindling schemes.
Paul]
"There are only two emotions in the market, hope & fear. The problem is you hope when you should fear & fear when you should hope: - Jesse Livermore
.