wazua Fri, Jan 2, 2026
Welcome Guest Search | Active Topics | Log In

3 Pages<123>
Museveni pissed off with Lamu port launch
Robinhood
#21 Posted : Tuesday, March 06, 2012 11:27:40 AM
Rank: Elder


Joined: 12/11/2008
Posts: 2,306
I think it is time we looked at these things in a less political way. Kibs can send Raila to conduct official business. It doesn't make Raila any less of a prime minister. If a key trading partner is such as UG is unhappy, surely this requires attention from the gar'ment and it does not have to follow the usual ODM/PNU fault lines.

My concern was not who sent who, but the fact that the issue is causing diplomatic tension with M7 claiming we back stabbed him. He wants East Africa to orbit around him and the fact the project has began based on national self interest for kenya, SS, and Ethiopia did not seem to make him happy.
Great men are not always wise, neither do the aged understand judgement...
Lolest!
#22 Posted : Tuesday, March 06, 2012 11:42:53 AM
Rank: Elder


Joined: 3/18/2011
Posts: 12,069
Location: Kianjokoma
Robinhood wrote:
I think it is time we looked at these things in a less political way. Kibs can send Raila to conduct official business. It doesn't make Raila any less of a prime minister. If a key trading partner is such as UG is unhappy, surely this requires attention from the gar'ment and it does not have to follow the usual ODM/PNU fault lines.

My concern was not who sent who, but the fact that the issue is causing diplomatic tension with M7 claiming we back stabbed him. He wants East Africa to orbit around him and the fact the project has began based on national self interest for kenya, SS, and Ethiopia did not seem to make him happy.


It was nothing serious bro. Take it easy.
Laughing out loudly smile Applause d'oh! Sad Drool Liar Shame on you Pray
KulaRaha
#23 Posted : Tuesday, March 06, 2012 11:47:57 AM
Rank: Elder


Joined: 7/26/2007
Posts: 6,514
FundamentAli wrote:
Apparently Southern Sudan has signed contracts with three countries including Uganda for oil pipelines. Uganda route should connect with Tanzanian port. Kenya is competition. IT is a question of who delivers first.


When it comes to quick deliver....you'll wait for 500 years for the dumb Tanzanians to deliver anything!
Business opportunities are like buses,there's always another one coming
Dash
#24 Posted : Tuesday, March 06, 2012 1:11:54 PM
Rank: Member


Joined: 3/24/2010
Posts: 677
Location: Nairobi
KulaRaha wrote:
FundamentAli wrote:
Apparently Southern Sudan has signed contracts with three countries including Uganda for oil pipelines. Uganda route should connect with Tanzanian port. Kenya is competition. IT is a question of who delivers first.


When it comes to quick deliver....you'll wait for 500 years for the dumb Tanzanians to deliver anything!

Salaaalaaaa!
mkeiy
#25 Posted : Tuesday, March 06, 2012 2:26:56 PM
Rank: Member


Joined: 1/27/2012
Posts: 851
Location: Nairobi
Lolest! wrote:
Robinhood wrote:
I think it is time we looked at these things in a less political way. Kibs can send Raila to conduct official business. It doesn't make Raila any less of a prime minister. If a key trading partner is such as UG is unhappy, surely this requires attention from the gar'ment and it does not have to follow the usual ODM/PNU fault lines.

My concern was not who sent who, but the fact that the issue is causing diplomatic tension with M7 claiming we back stabbed him. He wants East Africa to orbit around him and the fact the project has began based on national self interest for kenya, SS, and Ethiopia did not seem to make him happy.


It was nothing serious bro. Take it easy.


@Lolest, If so, why not stick to the issue at hand? There is a jokes corner i believe.
Must you politick at every opportune time?
mkeiy
#26 Posted : Tuesday, March 06, 2012 2:38:34 PM
Rank: Member


Joined: 1/27/2012
Posts: 851
Location: Nairobi
I read somewhere M7 had "advised" SS to build their own refinery and have the pipeline passing thru' UG. I think this guy has some beef with KE. When he was "advising", he didn't invite KE, what makes him think he should be engaged in the ground-breaking ceremony of what [allegedly], he was opposed to?
A dictator always demands it his way, no wonder he's complaining about UG's constitution, claiming it's stifling his efforts to move UG "forward".
itz
#27 Posted : Tuesday, March 06, 2012 3:42:24 PM
Rank: Member


Joined: 3/20/2009
Posts: 348
FundamentAli wrote:
Apparently Southern Sudan has signed contracts with three countries including Uganda for oil pipelines. Uganda route should connect with Tanzanian port. Kenya is competition. IT is a question of who delivers first.


yes this is one question i have been having.South Sudan has signed agreements with UG,Kenya,Ethiopia for oil pipelines.Are we going to spend all this money to connect pipelines to South Sudan and build expensive refineries in Lamu only for SS in the future to change its mind as they wish.Remember there is already the pipeline through N.Sudan with refineries infrastructure already set up.I think N.Sudan will have to at some point eat humble pie and agree to whatever conditions S.Sudan gives them.Some revenue is better than no revenue at all for N.Sudan on infrastructure that has already been build.We are talking of only 0.5m barrels a day.I think we have to be very careful and stop rushing.
Lolest!
#28 Posted : Tuesday, March 06, 2012 3:50:19 PM
Rank: Elder


Joined: 3/18/2011
Posts: 12,069
Location: Kianjokoma
mkeiy wrote:
Lolest! wrote:
Robinhood wrote:
I think it is time we looked at these things in a less political way. Kibs can send Raila to conduct official business. It doesn't make Raila any less of a prime minister. If a key trading partner is such as UG is unhappy, surely this requires attention from the gar'ment and it does not have to follow the usual ODM/PNU fault lines.

My concern was not who sent who, but the fact that the issue is causing diplomatic tension with M7 claiming we back stabbed him. He wants East Africa to orbit around him and the fact the project has began based on national self interest for kenya, SS, and Ethiopia did not seem to make him happy.


It was nothing serious bro. Take it easy.


@Lolest, If so, why not stick to the issue at hand? There is a jokes corner i believe.
Must you politick at every opportune time?

Please note that this thread is in the politics section and not the economy section in wazua! Still, if you go through the thread you will see my reply to the 'issue'.

That said, it seems you are new to wazua. We take time to be happy even as we discuss serious stuff. We do not reserve all our light moments for one thread!

Welcome to wazua.
Laughing out loudly smile Applause d'oh! Sad Drool Liar Shame on you Pray
mkeiy
#29 Posted : Tuesday, March 06, 2012 3:57:32 PM
Rank: Member


Joined: 1/27/2012
Posts: 851
Location: Nairobi
itz wrote:
FundamentAli wrote:
Apparently Southern Sudan has signed contracts with three countries including Uganda for oil pipelines. Uganda route should connect with Tanzanian port. Kenya is competition. IT is a question of who delivers first.


yes this is one question i have been having.South Sudan has signed agreements with UG,Kenya,Ethiopia for oil pipelines.Are we going to spend all this money to connect pipelines to South Sudan and build expensive refineries in Lamu only for SS in the future to change its mind as they wish.Remember there is already the pipeline through N.Sudan with refineries infrastructure already set up.I think N.Sudan will have to at some point eat humble pie and agree to whatever conditions S.Sudan gives them.Some revenue is better than no revenue at all for N.Sudan on infrastructure that has already been build.We are talking of only 0.5m barrels a day.I think we have to be very careful and stop rushing.


Didn't they say they were going to fund for the pipeline construction? If so, we don't have to worry.
Another thing, SS can never be at ease with Sudan, so the question of Sudan eating a humble pie wouldn't be very threatening. I think SS would prefer to do biz with any of the other countries than Sudan.

Lolest!
#30 Posted : Tuesday, March 06, 2012 4:02:48 PM
Rank: Elder


Joined: 3/18/2011
Posts: 12,069
Location: Kianjokoma
itz wrote:


South Sudan has signed agreements with UG,Kenya,Ethiopia for oil pipelines.Are we going to spend all this money to connect pipelines to South Sudan and build expensive refineries in Lamu only for SS in the future to change its mind as they wish.Remember there is already the pipeline through N.Sudan with refineries infrastructure already set up.I think N.Sudan will have to at some point eat humble pie and agree to whatever conditions S.Sudan gives them.Some revenue is better than no revenue at all for N.Sudan on infrastructure that has already been build.We are talking of only 0.5m barrels a day.I think we have to be very careful and stop rushing.

The costs for the project will be shared by the 3 states. The pipeline laying costs will be borne by S.Sudan which will then pay Kenya govt annual fees for the pipeline.
Laughing out loudly smile Applause d'oh! Sad Drool Liar Shame on you Pray
nostoppingthis
#31 Posted : Tuesday, March 06, 2012 4:05:33 PM
Rank: Chief


Joined: 8/24/2009
Posts: 5,909
Location: Nairobi
Lolest! wrote:
itz wrote:


South Sudan has signed agreements with UG,Kenya,Ethiopia for oil pipelines.Are we going to spend all this money to connect pipelines to South Sudan and build expensive refineries in Lamu only for SS in the future to change its mind as they wish.Remember there is already the pipeline through N.Sudan with refineries infrastructure already set up.I think N.Sudan will have to at some point eat humble pie and agree to whatever conditions S.Sudan gives them.Some revenue is better than no revenue at all for N.Sudan on infrastructure that has already been build.We are talking of only 0.5m barrels a day.I think we have to be very careful and stop rushing.

The costs for the project will be shared by the 3 states. The pipeline laying costs will be borne by S.Sudan which will then pay Kenya govt annual fees for the pipeline.


is Kenya assisting with fibre optic in return?
Insurgent
#32 Posted : Tuesday, March 06, 2012 4:05:50 PM
Rank: User


Joined: 8/6/2010
Posts: 594
Lolest! wrote:
Kibaki can send Raila? Is he snr to him?


Kibaki also sent Raila to South Sudan to prepare for the unveiling of Lamu port later. Would you ask who is senior to the other? The one who controls the armed forces is superior anytime. In other words, Amolo's position is like that of the British Queen.


"One man gives freely, yet gains even more; another withholds unduly, but comes to poverty. A generous man will prosper; he who refreshes others will himself be refreshed." Rev Canon Karanja.

Impunity
#33 Posted : Tuesday, March 06, 2012 4:07:30 PM
Rank: Elder


Joined: 3/2/2009
Posts: 26,330
Location: Masada
nostoppingthis wrote:
Lolest! wrote:
Kibaki can send Raila? Is he snr to him?


I also thought the errand boy is SKM


Laughing out loudly Laughing out loudly Laughing out loudly Laughing out loudly Laughing out loudly
Portfolio: Sold
You know you've made it when you get a parking space for your yatcht.

FundamentAli
#34 Posted : Tuesday, March 06, 2012 4:12:01 PM
Rank: Veteran


Joined: 11/4/2008
Posts: 1,289
Location: Nairobi
itz wrote:
FundamentAli wrote:
Apparently Southern Sudan has signed contracts with three countries including Uganda for oil pipelines. Uganda route should connect with Tanzanian port. Kenya is competition. IT is a question of who delivers first.


yes this is one question i have been having.South Sudan has signed agreements with UG,Kenya,Ethiopia for oil pipelines.Are we going to spend all this money to connect pipelines to South Sudan and build expensive refineries in Lamu only for SS in the future to change its mind as they wish.Remember there is already the pipeline through N.Sudan with refineries infrastructure already set up.I think N.Sudan will have to at some point eat humble pie and agree to whatever conditions S.Sudan gives them.Some revenue is better than no revenue at all for N.Sudan on infrastructure that has already been build.We are talking of only 0.5m barrels a day.I think we have to be very careful and stop rushing.

@Itz,

Our kilindini harbour is already overstretched. If exports and imports have to wait for weeks to be loaded and offloaded then we have a problem. The port cannot take super liners. The demand for port services is growing at a rate of 10% per annum. Whichever the case you need triple the capacity in 5 years time.
Insurgent
#35 Posted : Tuesday, March 06, 2012 4:14:52 PM
Rank: User


Joined: 8/6/2010
Posts: 594
Robinhood wrote:
I hear Kibs had to send RAO to reassure M7 that there is no plot to sideline him. Fellow had been sulking in a corner over the perceived slight.


Don't you know how much UG is going to lose when the superhighway, fibre optic and oil pipeline evade going through UG. M7 has a right to feel betrayed but something can be done from Isiolo or Turkana, that is why he wanted to be included in the whole deal.


"One man gives freely, yet gains even more; another withholds unduly, but comes to poverty. A generous man will prosper; he who refreshes others will himself be refreshed." Rev Canon Karanja.

Impunity
#36 Posted : Tuesday, March 06, 2012 4:20:30 PM
Rank: Elder


Joined: 3/2/2009
Posts: 26,330
Location: Masada
Magigi wrote:
Lolest! wrote:
Magigi wrote:
Lolest! wrote:
Kibaki can send Raila? Is he snr to him?

DELEGATION...my friend...In most cases boses delegate to their juniors not seniors...

Then nusu mkate has changed to slice moja!smile

...Enedlea kutuchekelea...Hivi karibuni tutakwa na mkate yote!!!


Itakuwa Mbofro!
Applause Applause Applause Applause
Portfolio: Sold
You know you've made it when you get a parking space for your yatcht.

callaspade
#37 Posted : Tuesday, March 06, 2012 4:27:44 PM
Rank: Veteran


Joined: 11/12/2009
Posts: 925
...i tend to think that efficiency is the problem at the port even when looking to increase capacity..
.......i remember a few years back when large cranes were brought in... nothing has changed since.

......we should critically be looking at sorting out laziness at "pwani si kenya...."
madammary
#38 Posted : Tuesday, March 06, 2012 7:00:43 PM
Rank: Member


Joined: 9/23/2011
Posts: 175
Location: Nairobi
Kwani museveni anataka nini? It doesn't make economic sense to build a pipeline running through UG to TZ and it's just proper that it passes through the second shortest route-that is through Kenya. Alafu tena, kwani port ya lamu,superhighways,railway lines, fibre optic cable, airports and resort cities huku Kenya zinamuhusu nini?
masukuma
#39 Posted : Tuesday, March 06, 2012 7:01:47 PM
Rank: Elder


Joined: 10/4/2006
Posts: 13,822
Location: Nairobi
Yani there are people who still think Raila is an equal to the president! u don't remember the business of 'Appointing official'. if they were equals both would have been presidents or prime ministers.
All Mushrooms are edible! Some Mushroom are only edible ONCE!
dunkang
#40 Posted : Tuesday, March 06, 2012 11:09:09 PM
Rank: Elder


Joined: 6/2/2011
Posts: 4,818
Location: -1.2107, 36.8831
RAO is a very big piece of a looooooser!

And, who funds this 'pwani si kenya' characters. M7, Kikwete or/and Bashir? I read mischief with this group!

M7 is very unhappy with this LAPPSET. Do you even remember that TZ tried to construct a road in the middle of a very important Wildlife migration corridor, just to make the Dar - Kampala Route shorter!

East African Community is just full of hypocrisy just like ODM. Visit jamiiforum a TZ version of wazua and you will notice Kenya been discussed in each and every thread!

Receive with simplicity everything that happens to you.” ― Rashi

Users browsing this topic
Guest (2)
3 Pages<123>
Forum Jump  
You cannot post new topics in this forum.
You cannot reply to topics in this forum.
You cannot delete your posts in this forum.
You cannot edit your posts in this forum.
You cannot create polls in this forum.
You cannot vote in polls in this forum.

Copyright © 2026 Wazua.co.ke. All Rights Reserved.