wazua Fri, May 15, 2026
Welcome Guest Search | Active Topics | Log In

5 Pages<12345>
Museveni pissed off with Lamu port launch
Robinhood
#21 Posted : Tuesday, March 06, 2012 11:27:40 AM
Rank: Elder

Joined: 12/11/2008
Posts: 2,306
I think it is time we looked at these things in a less political way. Kibs can send Raila to conduct official business. It doesn't make Raila any less of a prime minister. If a key trading partner is such as UG is unhappy, surely this requires attention from the gar'ment and it does not have to follow the usual ODM/PNU fault lines.

My concern was not who sent who, but the fact that the issue is causing diplomatic tension with M7 claiming we back stabbed him. He wants East Africa to orbit around him and the fact the project has began based on national self interest for kenya, SS, and Ethiopia did not seem to make him happy.
Great men are not always wise, neither do the aged understand judgement...
Lolest!
#22 Posted : Tuesday, March 06, 2012 11:42:53 AM
Rank: Elder

Joined: 3/18/2011
Posts: 12,069
Location: Kianjokoma
Robinhood wrote:
I think it is time we looked at these things in a less political way. Kibs can send Raila to conduct official business. It doesn't make Raila any less of a prime minister. If a key trading partner is such as UG is unhappy, surely this requires attention from the gar'ment and it does not have to follow the usual ODM/PNU fault lines.

My concern was not who sent who, but the fact that the issue is causing diplomatic tension with M7 claiming we back stabbed him. He wants East Africa to orbit around him and the fact the project has began based on national self interest for kenya, SS, and Ethiopia did not seem to make him happy.


It was nothing serious bro. Take it easy.
Laughing out loudly smile Applause d'oh! Sad Drool Liar Shame on you Pray
KulaRaha
#23 Posted : Tuesday, March 06, 2012 11:47:57 AM
Rank: Elder

Joined: 7/26/2007
Posts: 6,514
FundamentAli wrote:
Apparently Southern Sudan has signed contracts with three countries including Uganda for oil pipelines. Uganda route should connect with Tanzanian port. Kenya is competition. IT is a question of who delivers first.


When it comes to quick deliver....you'll wait for 500 years for the dumb Tanzanians to deliver anything!
Business opportunities are like buses,there's always another one coming
Dash
#24 Posted : Tuesday, March 06, 2012 1:11:54 PM
Rank: Member

Joined: 3/24/2010
Posts: 677
Location: Nairobi
KulaRaha wrote:
FundamentAli wrote:
Apparently Southern Sudan has signed contracts with three countries including Uganda for oil pipelines. Uganda route should connect with Tanzanian port. Kenya is competition. IT is a question of who delivers first.


When it comes to quick deliver....you'll wait for 500 years for the dumb Tanzanians to deliver anything!

Salaaalaaaa!
mkeiy
#25 Posted : Tuesday, March 06, 2012 2:26:56 PM
Rank: Member

Joined: 1/27/2012
Posts: 851
Location: Nairobi
Lolest! wrote:
Robinhood wrote:
I think it is time we looked at these things in a less political way. Kibs can send Raila to conduct official business. It doesn't make Raila any less of a prime minister. If a key trading partner is such as UG is unhappy, surely this requires attention from the gar'ment and it does not have to follow the usual ODM/PNU fault lines.

My concern was not who sent who, but the fact that the issue is causing diplomatic tension with M7 claiming we back stabbed him. He wants East Africa to orbit around him and the fact the project has began based on national self interest for kenya, SS, and Ethiopia did not seem to make him happy.


It was nothing serious bro. Take it easy.


@Lolest, If so, why not stick to the issue at hand? There is a jokes corner i believe.
Must you politick at every opportune time?
mkeiy
#26 Posted : Tuesday, March 06, 2012 2:38:34 PM
Rank: Member

Joined: 1/27/2012
Posts: 851
Location: Nairobi
I read somewhere M7 had "advised" SS to build their own refinery and have the pipeline passing thru' UG. I think this guy has some beef with KE. When he was "advising", he didn't invite KE, what makes him think he should be engaged in the ground-breaking ceremony of what [allegedly], he was opposed to?
A dictator always demands it his way, no wonder he's complaining about UG's constitution, claiming it's stifling his efforts to move UG "forward".
itz
#27 Posted : Tuesday, March 06, 2012 3:42:24 PM
Rank: Member

Joined: 3/20/2009
Posts: 348
FundamentAli wrote:
Apparently Southern Sudan has signed contracts with three countries including Uganda for oil pipelines. Uganda route should connect with Tanzanian port. Kenya is competition. IT is a question of who delivers first.


yes this is one question i have been having.South Sudan has signed agreements with UG,Kenya,Ethiopia for oil pipelines.Are we going to spend all this money to connect pipelines to South Sudan and build expensive refineries in Lamu only for SS in the future to change its mind as they wish.Remember there is already the pipeline through N.Sudan with refineries infrastructure already set up.I think N.Sudan will have to at some point eat humble pie and agree to whatever conditions S.Sudan gives them.Some revenue is better than no revenue at all for N.Sudan on infrastructure that has already been build.We are talking of only 0.5m barrels a day.I think we have to be very careful and stop rushing.
Lolest!
#28 Posted : Tuesday, March 06, 2012 3:50:19 PM
Rank: Elder

Joined: 3/18/2011
Posts: 12,069
Location: Kianjokoma
mkeiy wrote:
Lolest! wrote:
Robinhood wrote:
I think it is time we looked at these things in a less political way. Kibs can send Raila to conduct official business. It doesn't make Raila any less of a prime minister. If a key trading partner is such as UG is unhappy, surely this requires attention from the gar'ment and it does not have to follow the usual ODM/PNU fault lines.

My concern was not who sent who, but the fact that the issue is causing diplomatic tension with M7 claiming we back stabbed him. He wants East Africa to orbit around him and the fact the project has began based on national self interest for kenya, SS, and Ethiopia did not seem to make him happy.


It was nothing serious bro. Take it easy.


@Lolest, If so, why not stick to the issue at hand? There is a jokes corner i believe.
Must you politick at every opportune time?

Please note that this thread is in the politics section and not the economy section in wazua! Still, if you go through the thread you will see my reply to the 'issue'.

That said, it seems you are new to wazua. We take time to be happy even as we discuss serious stuff. We do not reserve all our light moments for one thread!

Welcome to wazua.
Laughing out loudly smile Applause d'oh! Sad Drool Liar Shame on you Pray
mkeiy
#29 Posted : Tuesday, March 06, 2012 3:57:32 PM
Rank: Member

Joined: 1/27/2012
Posts: 851
Location: Nairobi
itz wrote:
FundamentAli wrote:
Apparently Southern Sudan has signed contracts with three countries including Uganda for oil pipelines. Uganda route should connect with Tanzanian port. Kenya is competition. IT is a question of who delivers first.


yes this is one question i have been having.South Sudan has signed agreements with UG,Kenya,Ethiopia for oil pipelines.Are we going to spend all this money to connect pipelines to South Sudan and build expensive refineries in Lamu only for SS in the future to change its mind as they wish.Remember there is already the pipeline through N.Sudan with refineries infrastructure already set up.I think N.Sudan will have to at some point eat humble pie and agree to whatever conditions S.Sudan gives them.Some revenue is better than no revenue at all for N.Sudan on infrastructure that has already been build.We are talking of only 0.5m barrels a day.I think we have to be very careful and stop rushing.


Didn't they say they were going to fund for the pipeline construction? If so, we don't have to worry.
Another thing, SS can never be at ease with Sudan, so the question of Sudan eating a humble pie wouldn't be very threatening. I think SS would prefer to do biz with any of the other countries than Sudan.

Lolest!
#30 Posted : Tuesday, March 06, 2012 4:02:48 PM
Rank: Elder

Joined: 3/18/2011
Posts: 12,069
Location: Kianjokoma
itz wrote:


South Sudan has signed agreements with UG,Kenya,Ethiopia for oil pipelines.Are we going to spend all this money to connect pipelines to South Sudan and build expensive refineries in Lamu only for SS in the future to change its mind as they wish.Remember there is already the pipeline through N.Sudan with refineries infrastructure already set up.I think N.Sudan will have to at some point eat humble pie and agree to whatever conditions S.Sudan gives them.Some revenue is better than no revenue at all for N.Sudan on infrastructure that has already been build.We are talking of only 0.5m barrels a day.I think we have to be very careful and stop rushing.

The costs for the project will be shared by the 3 states. The pipeline laying costs will be borne by S.Sudan which will then pay Kenya govt annual fees for the pipeline.
Laughing out loudly smile Applause d'oh! Sad Drool Liar Shame on you Pray
5 Pages<12345>
Forum Jump  
You cannot post new topics in this forum.
You cannot reply to topics in this forum.
You cannot delete your posts in this forum.
You cannot edit your posts in this forum.
You cannot create polls in this forum.
You cannot vote in polls in this forum.

Copyright © 2026 Wazua.co.ke. All Rights Reserved.