muganda wrote:I understand a man having to support his off-spring and avowed wife after separation. But this situation where a man Is compelled to provide for children that are not his (1.6m) and for an ex-wife who has a job/lover/owes you money. Gosh! In return for what !#?...
US Law should similarly require the woman to provide conjugal rights (for the man's sake), weekly and passionately, after he has similarly moved on. Now that's fair and square.
Hapo umeongea kama all men in Nairophy.
But again I think the law is damn useless.Why should you pay for upkeep of a woman you have separated with?The children is okay.
This make me worry so much for those of us who vehemently voted for the new Katimba.The new katimba was a just a copy paste from the gayish west and drafted by activist supported by the very very Wierd Wild West!!!Let me state again here for the upteenth time that I emphantically voted NO.Portfolio: Sold
You know you've made it when you get a parking space for your yatcht.