Who is fooling who?

Either Wakambo ama Wakalucy

http://www.nation.co.ke/...62/-/8s5103/-/index.html

I don't believe Kibaki hosted the Mungiki at State House.

The more state house denies the more it feels that the meeting actually did occur...state house also confirmed that on the said date the president met with the kibaki tena campaign team to express his marshal plan for the YOUTH!! am i reading tooooo much in that statement?
and by the way when is balozi n uk resigning?

Some things are not adding up. If the said meeting was meant to organize for retaliatory attacks, how come it was held before the elections? Hii ni domo tu!

Maina Njenga was receiving 20M while at Naivasha Prison. He would then distribute it while in jail. He would diligently serve the same govt that killed his relatives and followers. UK distributed close to 100m(from where?) just for the purposes of killing people.

A meeting was held in November 2007 to plan for retaliation attacks which would be done in Late January. The evil machinery that Uhuru, Kibaki, Muthaura, Njenga built in Nov. 2007 was watching for almost a whole month(30th Dec to Jan 24) as the people who they were supposed to protect(read Kikuyus) were butchered, raped and had their property damaged. The ICC prosecutor and judges must be super-geniuses or super-morons!

So UK's residence is also called Statehouse?

And do we have cctv's at Statehouse?

The key word here is "retaliatory".

An ICC Project is being prepared to be the next president of Kenya.

Statements such as "Case to be a lesson for the rest of Africa", "Those who bear the biggest responsibility", and the new one when Judge Ekaterina was delivering the confirmation, "In the context of the Kenyan situation". Very subjective statements coming from an international court. All these utterances only confirm to you that the court has stooped to the levels of a kangaroo court.

No Wonder Judge Kaul alikuwa anakataa hii maneno,Ocampo says MK attended the Mungiki meeting in statehouse yet later on anakuja kutuambia he had absolutely nothing to implicate the two Principals.....

Ocampo amechanganikiwa kabisa, was the meeting before or after the PEV????

Where did Ocampo get this evidence from? If from the two witnesses who may be questionable then lets not look at this as gospel truth. Now that the cases have been confirmed, there will be opportunity to cross examine the said witnesses and then will we only know the truth. Kibs may have many failures but this would be something I doubt he would do, not sure about UK though.