Scubidu wrote:
@sure. Well BAT is not paying zero interest but on lenient terms and off course in this environment it's difficult to do so. The dividend affects cashflows and the decision to increase borrowing to pay the dividend is at the discretion of management.
The dividend is a policy that needs to be maintained (the company and shareholders alike endorses it) and whether or not it's borrowed it's still paid from retained earnings. The BAT board doesn't have an obligation to anything pronto and shareholders haven't disapproved the company paying 100% of earnings.
Even sufferingcon paid it's dividends after receiving a loan (syndicated and from bond proceeds)-it's not a conventional loan but a loan none the less.
What is the purpose of the board (and by extension the company) in the first instance?
a)To make maximum profit.
b)To create jobs and serve society
c)Build shareholders' wealth
d)Pay maximum dividends every year
By the way, borrowing from a bank at whatever interest only benefits the bank, not the company that borrows. Borrowing for the sake of doing so (because the money is available to be borrowed) is the height of insanity that the swines are facing right now in Europe and America.
If Williamson Tea has the foresight of retaining profits for a rainy day to keep dividend pay out consistent and avoid borrowing, why won't BAT do the same?
Maybe, just maybe, BAT pays out almost 100% dividends to avoid class law suites like has happened elsewhere. That way, they have no cash to be raided and to compound issues, they keep their bank accounts on debit (loan). Do you pay tax on loans? Am trying to think outside the box. Was it Scubby doo.
Wisdom to detect when share prices hit rock bottom.
When interest on bonds keep going up, you know the bear run is on high street. When interest on bonds start leveling, the bear has met the bull and they have hit rock bottom. When the interest rates on bonds start coming down, the bull has overpowered the bear and you better be riding the bull.