kwani closed chambers akina UK/FM are not there? i thot they only bar the media coverage na wale wako kwa public gallery.. am sure the accused have to hear what is being said..

.....Hii kitu hakuna haja ya witnesses, they will always stutter at some point!!!

Why would they have to hear if what he is disclosing is incriminating to save his skin? The accused are quite influential...

The fact that they are still holding their positions might actually work against them in the long run. This for me could be proof enough that maybe, just maybe, the infamous meeting in state house did indeed take place.

the cases will be confirmed but do not see a conviction of more than 1 person of the 6 after full trial. tone down expectations and expend more energy to the unreconciled issues still boiling under the surface waiting for the next trigger to unleash even worse violence.

Katee's evidence is very tricky. I think he brought matters to head. If he is believed then the prosecution has no case. The judges had to be tough on him because of this fact. It is not going to be an easy call for them either.

This is the reason I wish I were a lawyer getting freebies.

Many a time Turufosa has stated that this is not a trial.

This period is meant to make sure that Ogambo and his minions don't take an INNOCENT man to trial. It is not to prove guilt or innocence or even that Ogambo did not investigate.

So it is a fallacy to state as the media has been stating that Ocampo has to prove anything at this juncture.

In fact, it is the defence on trial here. They have to show absolutely and in no uncertain terms that their guys are innocent. Eg. You see that kameeting you were saying I was, I was in Karumaindo with my ndogo ndogo and here are the pictures.....etc.

All that ogambo and the nigerians have to show is a train of thought and a logic behind their thinking. So far, you be the judge.

But it would be a good thing to listen to the judges questions as it will be very clear what they are thinking.

So after the DC said all he had to say, they thought, isn't this the same guy who said something before a different judge? So who did he lie to? Could he do it again?

So Kahns emotional outbursts are just a sideshow. Listen to the lines of questioning from the judges. Therein lies the problem.

I know there's a place called Flyover on Nairobi - Naivasha road. I also know of Mai Mahiu centre, a junction to Narok one side and Naivasha on the other. Lakini hii Mai Mahiu Flyover sijui ni gani.

Things were cool in Naivasha when he moved his family from Nakuru which was in chaos. I repeat, many of us aren't paying attention to details. When someone is not articulate, it doesn't mean he's contradicting himself. It simply means he'll take longer to give you the answer you are looking for.

All those who think there's been contradiction, state what was contradicted and don't mistake with what Ekaterina sought for clarity. We have biased opinions here, and as per yesterday, there was nothing incriminating FM. Let us not convict anyone for the sake of conviction, let us seek justice through the truth.

Does it help seeing an innocent person jailed for our satisfaction, and the masterminds are roaming at large? Won't they repeat the same tricks in the next elections?

Muthaura said though he is a suspect in this case, it is actually Ocampo who is on trial.

I now know why.

Ocampo team must have been shocked with the witness account given yesterday.

Ocampos witnesses seem ureliable, if Khans submission is anything to go by.


Putting records straight;

It is common knowledge that Police shoot to immobilise - a basic fact.

It is NOT among the charges though that the police shot citizens dead.

The DC was only careful when talking about it merely to avoid self incrimination.

The Judges asked the DC questions to seek clarification. These clarifications may work for or against the suspect.

Waki report is just that - a report - not a judgement nor the gospel truth.
The Judges have a duty to interrogate the so called Waki report before using it to pass judgement on the suspects.

The Waki report is not their document - they can hence not authenticate its integrity.

Two laywers - Adeboye (prosecution) and the Anya (Victims)were unnecessariry rude to the DC.

You have a good memory - sarcasm.
You traveled all the way here to ome and say you dont know - rude.

This shows frustration on their part - trying underhand tactics to get the witness worked up - and a chance of getting himself mixed up.