Is it only my observations or have others noticed that the uhuru 3 appears to be less prepared than the ruto 3? Mimi naona kama akina uhuru wanakaragwa zaidi.

I saw the DC answering his own questions more than once. He pretended not to know the difference between taking notes and taking minutes in a meeting. He also thought the prosecution didn't know the difference between Public Service Commission and the Head of Public Service.

That is the problem of coaching / cramming , You get in the exam room and everything evaporates .Then you start answering your own questions(irrelevant answers).

I also think Ruto may be acquitted for lack of enough evidence due to the prosecutors contradictory evidence(not that I wish it to happen though since I believe with proper investigation ,Ruto has a case to answer) but for Muthaura , mambo ni ngumu.The witnesses are just spoiling for him.

who wants to bet this katee will soon be promoted to some plum job once he gets back from hague for his part as muthauras witness?

Watching this thing is like watching a horror movie.

According to the defense, Ocampo has no evidence since he's relying on Waki, KNHCr etc reports.

Well, Katerina just threw that idea out the window with its baby too by extensively quoting the Waki report.

Nothing is worse than a "super duper" witness who does not know his bosses name, doesn't know mai mahiu flyover and only saw people carrying rocks, sticks and rungus (no pangas). By the way, he moved his own family to "safety" even though he thought things were super cool.

Come on, Katerina even quoted "lawyer" Monari in the questioning. Maybe as warning to Monari that they know about him too.

I now understand why someone would want to stand in their own defence. These witnesses may send you to trial faster than ogambo's evidence.