the second batch of the Ocampo six have good lawyers-based on what we've heard so far

honestly, i felt the same too... i think their tactic thus far is to punch holes in the evidence presented, to divert attention and bring in all faults they can find in technicalities... otherwise, i didnt see someone trying to prove that all those who were there were innocent.... or may be that is what is done at the trial... trying not to pre-empt...may be... if that is not the case, then they arent doing enough.... unless they know 'technicalities' with such a court are more important than the real evidence... which tends to be the case with organisations owned by different jurisdictions.

Uhuru's counsel, he sounded more like a prosecutor to RAO than a defense team to UK.... Its like he was there to incriminate RAO and not to defend his client... Finding RAO guilty doesn't exonerate his client from any wrong doing...

Totally agree, i still think Ocampo should consider himself very lucky if he even manages to have any of the case involving the three confirmed. Guys come here to tell us sijui this lawyer is crap mara sijui they are only talking about Raila yet hata hakuna kitu ya maana Ocampo amesema. So far he has failed to unleash anything that seriously proves the suspects have a case to answer.

@Taz
...I disagree. It is too early to judge...He is saving the best for last...You don't dance yourself lame before the main dance.
...Na kumbe unatokeanga huku...Ungekaa tu huko kwa sports...Huku ni takataka tu...

There is a court statement in vioja mahakamani, that goes like:

Mshukiwa , ukiwa na wengine ambao hawako kwa hii korti , mnatuumiwa kwamba mlihusika kufanya hualifu....
Is the mshtakiwa supposed to tell the judge to bring hao wengine ambao hawako kwa hii Korti ....can a culprit use it as part of the defense....Just asking