masukuma wrote:kumbuka the admission by witnesses that crimes occurred (obviously!) is not an admission that the accused 3 are responsible for the crimes.
the only +ve thing i can see on Ocampo's team is that they can read the statement of charges :) their questions to witnesses are lame! they are more a recital of what is in the statement of charges. they show total ignorance to the Kenyan reality!
remember the judges are neutral and if 2 out of 3 are convinced that OKamboz evidence is garbage the dudes are home free.
@Masukuma, For the first time in Wazua, I agree with you, Ocampo has shown very little to support all the talk he has been making.
However, I am not sure if we understand the game, is he supposed to provide evidence at this stage or simply demonstrate that the suspects were capable of doing what they are charged with.
"The purpose of bureaucracy is to compensate for incompetence and lack of discipline." James Collins