The story we are getting is not objective since those reporting are interested parties in the dispute. And our Kenyan media houses [especially the big 3 - NMG, SGL, and RMS] have serious objectivity issues when it comes to stories touching on them.
They are trying to create the impression that the license was give to the "oppressive" Chinese government, yet it was given to a PRIVATE company owned by Chinese nationals.
Secondly, there is nothing in the tender requirements that says when the applicant should get relevant documents. So the claim that the Certificate of Tax Compliance is dubious because it was acquired one week before the tender closing/opening date is frivolous at the least.
Third, the appeal process has not been exhausted. The Kenyan media can now go to the high court and seek redress IFF they have valid grounds. After all; there is a new Sheriff in town.
Nothing is real unless it can be named; nothing has value unless it can be sold; money is worthless unless you spend it.