wazua Sun, Aug 3, 2025
Welcome Guest Search | Active Topics | Log In

3 Pages<123>
Kenya Airways
festom
#21 Posted : Thursday, April 23, 2009 1:42:00 PM
Rank: Member


Joined: 8/15/2008
Posts: 84
@Ric dees

Are you trying to tell us that you can modify planes to increase their capacity once they leave their manufacturers? Which Jua kali fundis do they employ to do this? Hehehehe.

Correct me if i'm wrong,The specs of the plane you want are given to the manufacturers before the construction is done.

Airlines make upto 40% markup on their cost. so imagine how much money they make when they fly a full plane!

Having paid 400 pounds apprx Ksh48,000 and got a refund of 300 dollars approx Ksh24,000 they ended up charging you 50% of the fare. Believe me KQ is making More money /plane than Emirates.

Last yr Kq made Ksh 5 Billion with 22planes as opposed to Emirates Ksh13.5 billion with 121 planes



Don't sit and wait - look for the next opportunity
Ric dees
#22 Posted : Thursday, April 23, 2009 2:04:00 PM
Rank: Member


Joined: 3/6/2008
Posts: 632
@ Mukiha

Finally some sanity..an explanation that makes sense..cheers.

Mcreggae

Where do i start..when Boeng were developing the 777 futher..which was the crsoo between 747 and 767..they needed to factor in advanteges of both career..eg 747 carries more lbs and 767..uses less fuel travels futher.

If you look at the fuselage of 777,its being designed to be very lean to minimise drag..with a high payload,and travels futher without refueling hence the LR range. How does one achieve this..? To travel futher one you need a bigger fuel tank..come the wing flaps..which serves two purposes..for navigation and as an extra fuel tank..then there is fly-by-wire and configuration of the hold. Also to note futher to this Boeing has/had developed the 777 series with a retractable wings to allow them to park in small airports next to smaller careers,but however to one has shown interest on this ...next question.

You talk of a 777F this is laughable..but sample this..Emirates will gladly leave your baggage if they have a big 'LOAD' esp travelling to and from Far east and ship it to you late..

@ That other guy..sina la kusema.



Heart is what separates the good from the great - Micheal Jordan.

The greatest danger in times of turbulence is not the turbulence; it is to act with yesterday's logic.
meow
#23 Posted : Thursday, April 23, 2009 2:38:00 PM
Rank: Member


Joined: 4/11/2009
Posts: 48
Am amazed this @Ric Dees guy is more informed than all the lame ducks and duckettes who initially hopelessly opened their mouths hear (earlier).I have above average info about airplanes and the industry,but this guy Ric Dees is well informed about this industry.

Cheers Ric Dees...........
simonkabz
#24 Posted : Thursday, April 23, 2009 4:22:00 PM
Rank: Elder


Joined: 3/2/2007
Posts: 8,776
Location: Cameroon
@ ric,nimebow down. I know smart guys when I see them,kaa kali bro! Now onto the 777 with Variable Geometry wings,thats new. And for parking purposes only?? (btw...VG like the F14 or folding like the naval Mig29?)

Truest proverb: Mwenda pole hajikwai
TULIA.........UFUNZWE!
VituVingiSana
#25 Posted : Thursday, April 23, 2009 9:30:00 PM
Rank: Chief


Joined: 1/3/2007
Posts: 18,223
Location: Nairobi
I was reading up on planes... and Wikipedia has great info on the various aircraft and their specifications...

As for KQ... it is true they have not made a loss for 10 years (on an annual basis) & it remains one of the few airlines (expected) to be profitable in 2009.

I think the 2008-9 results will be much better than what journalists/analysts have been predicting.

Greedy when others are fearful,Very fearful when others are greedy - to paraphrase WB
Greedy when others are fearful. Very fearful when others are greedy - to paraphrase Warren Buffett
VituVingiSana
#26 Posted : Thursday, April 23, 2009 9:38:00 PM
Rank: Chief


Joined: 1/3/2007
Posts: 18,223
Location: Nairobi
KQ lost money on you. Between the $300 (cash) & the $70 Panari room + transport. BUT how was the 2nd flight (the one you got on)? Was it full?

Greedy when others are fearful,Very fearful when others are greedy - to paraphrase WB
Greedy when others are fearful. Very fearful when others are greedy - to paraphrase Warren Buffett
Goals
#27 Posted : Friday, April 24, 2009 7:11:00 AM
Rank: Member


Joined: 10/6/2008
Posts: 118
This is the opportunity cost of retaining you as a customer. could be they used a smaller aircraft hence the numbers. its gain or loss depending on situation,think of guys going for biz or interviews.

I can teach anybody how to get whatever they want out of life. The problem is that I can't find anybody who can tell me what they want.' Mark Twain
VituVingiSana
#28 Posted : Friday, April 24, 2009 9:02:00 AM
Rank: Chief


Joined: 1/3/2007
Posts: 18,223
Location: Nairobi
The Airline business is complex... Do you fly a 767 or a 777... and this is BEFORE you know how many passengers you know you will have... Then there are the no-shows... and fuel prices... and taxes...

*** The GBP400 tix was a bargain...
*** The $300-500 payment might be a good deal for KQ if they were able to sell other tickets at higher prices to those who HAD to be in London...

*** I was surprised at the 70-80 'extra' passengers coz that is way over-booked... 25% on a 777 (322 pax capacity)

Greedy when others are fearful,Very fearful when others are greedy - to paraphrase WB
Greedy when others are fearful. Very fearful when others are greedy - to paraphrase Warren Buffett
Ric dees
#29 Posted : Friday, April 24, 2009 10:16:00 AM
Rank: Member


Joined: 3/6/2008
Posts: 632
@ VVS

True this is a very complex business with so many variables and you mentioned some..that said..I understand airlines cannot book more than 10% of the capacity and this is what was baffling me and..i understand how they might make money but i wanted to hear different ideas..As somebody asked / mentioned the flight i got into was fully booked and again some people were left and their in lies my querry..how are they able to make money under this circumstances and the present economic climate..but now i guess it's much clearer...

@SimonKabbz

Interesting you mention the F14 Tomcat and though am not sure but this is where they got the design from albeit for different purposes..the F14 most notable use of the retractable wing is during flight incorporating high Mach numbers,and this helps in dogfights as opposed to 777..but i don't think they are outdone on this..only time will tell they might just convince some Middle east carrier it's usefulness..

On a different note the Emirates A380 is a design marvel...during night flights ..if you look at the top of the fuselage you will be forgiven to think you are looking at the sky coz all you can see is the stars..and in the morning one is awoken by birds.singing/ chirps .like in jungle..awesome..





Heart is what separates the good from the great - Micheal Jordan.

The greatest danger in times of turbulence is not the turbulence; it is to act with yesterday's logic.
Jaymiggy
#30 Posted : Friday, April 24, 2009 11:38:00 AM
Rank: Member


Joined: 12/18/2008
Posts: 23
For a record guys,the 10% is just a guideline,not a rule!! some routes have statistically recorded &gt;40% NoShow rate. And one more thing,KQ is not in the cargo business yet,hence they concentrate on passenger transport which constitutes more than 75% of their revenue and more importantly their budget.

Emirates is a great Airline,and they are prestigius to say the least. But KQ makes money,profits. Thats what matters to them since KQ is a public owned company as oppossed to Emirates.
VituVingiSana
#31 Posted : Sunday, April 26, 2009 11:04:00 AM
Rank: Chief


Joined: 1/3/2007
Posts: 18,223
Location: Nairobi
Just to be clear... was your 2nd flight (the one you actually flew on) also over-booked?

Greedy when others are fearful,Very fearful when others are greedy - to paraphrase WB
Greedy when others are fearful. Very fearful when others are greedy - to paraphrase Warren Buffett
VituVingiSana
#32 Posted : Sunday, April 26, 2009 11:07:00 AM
Rank: Chief


Joined: 1/3/2007
Posts: 18,223
Location: Nairobi
@ric dees - The A 380 has that 'star' lighting installed. The new 787s will also have similar features including mood lighting... Basically on long flights the lighting will follow the destination's 'lighting' so you reduce your jetlag e.g. if flying to USA from Nairobi... & you leave at 8am,the lighting will remain 'bright' to keep you awake... as far as is practical...

Greedy when others are fearful,Very fearful when others are greedy - to paraphrase WB
Greedy when others are fearful. Very fearful when others are greedy - to paraphrase Warren Buffett
The General
#33 Posted : Tuesday, October 06, 2009 6:27:00 AM
Rank: Member


Joined: 6/3/2006
Posts: 553
KQ,Eagle Airlines seal deal (right click,open link in new tab/window)


The thicker the thigh the sweeter the pie.
The thicker the thigh the sweeter the pie.
The General
#34 Posted : Wednesday, October 07, 2009 1:12:00 PM
Rank: Member


Joined: 6/3/2006
Posts: 553
Kenya Airways after the storm

The thicker the thigh the sweeter the pie.
The thicker the thigh the sweeter the pie.
Lyanne
#35 Posted : Wednesday, October 07, 2009 1:50:00 PM
Rank: Member


Joined: 5/5/2009
Posts: 181
Gosh ! At times the knowledge levels in SK are humbling. I never could have mentioned a concentration of sharp minds anywhere than here.

My only concern is do i accumulate this stock till late next year ?


The Hedonist
Kausha
#36 Posted : Wednesday, October 07, 2009 2:53:00 PM
Rank: Member


Joined: 2/8/2007
Posts: 808
Ric dix asked a valid question! and I can to a very high degree say KQ is loosing quite some cash. Some of the arguments here are very makaratasi. If the airline has a margin of 40% of flying costs then refunding 300 baux on a ticket of 400 baux is criminal regardless of the ticket pricing mix,and if this is happening the way I have seen it happening,well KQ is gone to the dogs. I will be surprised if they make a profit. remember we still have more fuel write offs coming up. Aaahh and there is the 400m revenue lost during the strike.

And as for last 2009 results,the annual report reads loss after tax of 4.083 billion,what's this nonsense of no loss in past 10 years,and write off losses are losses not recoverable simmilar to bank provisions.
McReggae
#37 Posted : Wednesday, October 07, 2009 6:54:00 PM
Rank: Elder


Joined: 6/17/2008
Posts: 23,365
Location: Nairobi
Kausha,yua post is obviously from a point of ignorance,update your knowledge on KQ's financials then we can discuss!

The chief value of money lies in the fact that one lives in a world in which it is overestimated.
..."Wewe ni mtu mdogo sana....na mwenye amekuandika pia ni mtu mdogo sana!".
itz
#38 Posted : Thursday, October 08, 2009 12:30:00 AM
Rank: Member


Joined: 3/20/2009
Posts: 348
airline business is among the most capital intensive businesses one can invest in.a good example is why KQ took so long to pay dividends after it went public many years back.the reason is they were using all the capital to buy their planes and grow their business.If you had put your money in other companies in the same period of time you would have made huge returns.ROIC on airlines is quite low compared to other industries. Airlines are also at the mercy of fuel prices.see what happened to KQ when fuel went to 147 dollars per barrel,their profits declined big time and it showed KQ doesn't good oil price hedging capabilities. It is good that they have made profits for the 10-11 years but remember there will be increased competition in the years to come and high oil prices will be back.it might be a good short term investment but not for long term 4+ years.
Kausha
#39 Posted : Thursday, October 08, 2009 6:50:00 AM
Rank: Member


Joined: 2/8/2007
Posts: 808
Mc reggae

Which financials are you talking about? do you even know what are financials in the first place...i have on my desk KQ annual report 2008/09 otherwise read as 09,go to page 58 and look at loss / profit before taxation if you can't see (5,664m),then ......but in the event you understand what that number number is,come back i teach you how to digest financials.

Itz
Stop lying to us about capital intensive! there are businesses using more capital than KQ and churning out great ROICs. Look at oil,both upstream and downstream businesses they use much more capital than KQ and very regularly. So hiyo argument yako ni ya jobless corner not this forum. Look at other airlines and the ROIC they deliver,i have in mind Singapore airlines,Cathay,Qantas,Ryan air to name a few look at their ROIC and see what they get. KQ has been flying around like a headless chicken for sometime now,other than their great network which can easily be replicated they stink in everything else.

Also don't tell us about fuel,fuel pricing is part of KPIs of the executive management and Board! next time you will tell us KQ cant expand fast coz of pilot shortage! A soft example on KQ's botched leadership - how is it that KLM had hedged fuel below USD 80 and KQ was hedging at an AVCO of 112USD and yet KQ is an associate of KLM and has board members from KLM? what do they discuss in the board ? Look at the aircraft orders,KQ has among the worst procurement strategy its too reactive!
Pierce
#40 Posted : Thursday, October 08, 2009 6:54:00 AM
Rank: Veteran


Joined: 3/16/2009
Posts: 1,464
Ring ring.................hedge loss now reversing........

A 777-300ER now taking off to the sky ..........
Users browsing this topic
Guest
3 Pages<123>
Forum Jump  
You cannot post new topics in this forum.
You cannot reply to topics in this forum.
You cannot delete your posts in this forum.
You cannot edit your posts in this forum.
You cannot create polls in this forum.
You cannot vote in polls in this forum.

Copyright © 2025 Wazua.co.ke. All Rights Reserved.