@Borsenmakler,
All, or most, market players need information and efficient and effective information channels in order to reduce their costs and to raise revenues.
Consider also, that trust between any two parties can exist if none of the parties anticipate/expect to lose from their interaction, or, both parties have something to gain and the gains are divided fairly.
Now,brands need trust and consumers need trustworthy brands. Thus, brands can provide consumers with information that leads to savings(while utilizing the brands)and also help in easing information access, for example by sponsoring infomercials.Consumers on the other hand will be 'compelled' to cooperate since they have more to gain and less to lose.
If one can create the infrastructure and the relationship 'rules' and engage with the relevant players then Nash equilibrium conditions can be attained. And this is what we've been doing for the last 2 years.What we have is a pivot point that can turn a huge ship with little effort.
@the deal,
Since you have so many unanswered questions, may I infer that you are using instinct to pass your judgement?
@Mukiha,
My proposal is en route.
@Gordon Gekko,
It makes a lot of sense to notify the CBK when it comes to the 500M plus returns; this will be done at the right moment. Nevertheless, I would like you to stop using the pyramid scheme analogy since it is not applicable. The dissimilarities between such schemes and what we have are too many to be ignored.
@josiah33,
One can design a rocket with full capabilities and fail to get an astronaut to use it. The crux of the matter is political concord. At least the CBK works that way.
@The Merchant,
You'll surely get my proposal.Thanks.