Wazua
»
Club SK
»
Politics
»
FIDA halts swearing in of supreme court judges
Rank: Elder Joined: 10/13/2009 Posts: 1,950 Location: in kenya
|
This is just brinkMANship they are using the equality card when as we are speaking there is no single lady in the court of appeal...what have they done about that. JSC has given them 1/3 of the seats in the supreme court what do they want NOW. '......to the acknowledgment of the mystery of God, and of the Father, and of Christ; 3 In whom are hid all the treasures of wisdom and knowledge.' Colossians 2:2-3
|
|
|
Rank: Elder Joined: 5/24/2007 Posts: 1,805
|
selah wrote:This is just brinkMANship they are using the equality card when as we are speaking there is no single lady in the court of appeal...what have they done about that.
JSC has given them 1/3 of the seats in the supreme court what do they want NOW. They want to get noticed you know . Miaka inaenda....lol!  I Think Therefore I Am
|
|
|
Rank: Elder Joined: 3/2/2009 Posts: 26,325 Location: Masada
|
@bwenyenye, ROR... I would really want to meet a man who mounts these ladies in their private hoods;I want to be one,where can I hook one? Portfolio: Sold
You know you've made it when you get a parking space for your yatcht.
|
|
|
Rank: Veteran Joined: 11/4/2008 Posts: 1,289 Location: Nairobi
|
FIDA is demanding 2 1/3 of the seven be women. How do we get 1/3 of a person? Enyewe Sheria ni Ngumu. YOu should increase Supreme court Judges to Nine to have 3 women
|
|
|
Rank: Member Joined: 2/25/2010 Posts: 158
|
Impunity wrote:@bwenyenye, ROR...
I would really want to meet a man who mounts these ladies in their private hoods;I want to be one,where can I hook one? Excuse me! This kind of talk is not proper. FIDA lawyers are not there to be 'mounted in their private hoods' by people like Impunity. This is gender insensitive talk and the modulator should look into this. When I was married to my husband, he used to come home and beat me each time Martha Karua appeared on T.V (which was often during the Kanu/Moi Days. He told his friends that he was 'beating' one of them lawyers. This attitude should not be allowed. Why do men want to use their maleness to suppress women? Why would 'impunity' want to mount a Fida woman just because he feels threatened by them or such? Please let us look at the substance of what FIDA is saying before we personalise issues. Keeping it all in the family
|
|
|
Rank: Elder Joined: 3/18/2011 Posts: 12,069 Location: Kianjokoma
|
@impunity, you remind me of marendes nasty comments on these ladies.
|
|
|
Rank: Elder Joined: 10/14/2009 Posts: 2,057
|
|
|
|
Rank: Elder Joined: 10/13/2009 Posts: 1,950 Location: in kenya
|
anika66 wrote:Impunity wrote:@bwenyenye, ROR...
I would really want to meet a man who mounts these ladies in their private hoods;I want to be one,where can I hook one? Excuse me! This kind of talk is not proper. FIDA lawyers are not there to be 'mounted in their private hoods' by people like Impunity. This is gender insensitive talk and the modulator should look into this. When I was married to my husband, he used to come home and beat me each time Martha Karua appeared on T.V (which was often during the Kanu/Moi Days. He told his friends that he was 'beating' one of them lawyers. This attitude should not be allowed. Why do men want to use their maleness to suppress women? Why would 'impunity' want to mount a Fida woman just because he feels threatened by them or such? Please let us look at the substance of what FIDA is saying before we personalise issues. Now thats bad. maendeleo ya wanaume cant help such a person. '......to the acknowledgment of the mystery of God, and of the Father, and of Christ; 3 In whom are hid all the treasures of wisdom and knowledge.' Colossians 2:2-3
|
|
|
Rank: Elder Joined: 9/7/2010 Posts: 2,148 Location: elderville
|
selah wrote:This is just brinkMANship they are using the equality card when as we are speaking there is no single lady in the court of appeal...what have they done about that.
JSC has given them 1/3 of the seats in the supreme court what do they want NOW. I totally fail to see the relevance of the bolded part. On their being given 1/3 of the seats by the JSC from the news it seems that among other things they are using Article 27 (8) of the Constitution which provides that: Quote:8) In addition to the measures contemplated in clause (6), the State shall take legislative and other measures to implement the principle that not more than two-thirds of the members of elective or appointive bodies shall be of the same gender. If that Article is applicable then the question should be whether 5 out of 7 is more than two-thirds and not if you can get an exact number for a third from 7. He who can express in words the ardour of his love, has but little love to express. - Petrach, Son. (That men by various ways arrive at the same end. - Montaigne, The Essays of.)
|
|
|
Rank: Veteran Joined: 7/22/2008 Posts: 1,139
|
I have also checked on the equation and realized that 0.28 requires they get a another woman. one man-judge will be dropped. "You're not supposed to be so blind with patriotism that you can't face reality. Wrong is wrong, no matter who says it". Malcolm X
|
|
|
Rank: Elder Joined: 3/2/2009 Posts: 26,325 Location: Masada
|
anika66 wrote:Impunity wrote:@bwenyenye, ROR...
I would really want to meet a man who mounts these ladies in their private hoods;I want to be one,where can I hook one? Excuse me! This kind of talk is not proper. FIDA lawyers are not there to be 'mounted in their private hoods' by people like Impunity. This is gender insensitive talk and the modulator should look into this. When I was married to my husband, he used to come home and beat me each time Martha Karua appeared on T.V (which was often during the Kanu/Moi Days. He told his friends that he was 'beating' one of them lawyers. This attitude should not be allowed. Why do men want to use their maleness to suppress women? Why would 'impunity' want to mount a Fida woman just because he feels threatened by them or such? Please let us look at the substance of what FIDA is saying before we personalise issues. @Troubled Lady, I was not insunating that those ladies be mounted for disciplinary purposes, but I was imagining how a man would feel to have mounted the tough beatifull lady-lawyers. I havent met those type of men in my local pub! Sorry if I injured your old wound.  Portfolio: Sold
You know you've made it when you get a parking space for your yatcht.
|
|
|
Rank: Veteran Joined: 5/13/2010 Posts: 869 Location: Nairobi
|
@Impunity, some of your comments are just distasteful and disrespectful of women. Your mum & sisters are women too. Its become tiring hearing these kind of comments from you & other like minded Wazuans. Like in this case, the issue was the gender balance on the nominees. Where does the mounting come in? Please learn what to say and what to keep as unsaid. At least for the sake of respect for us of the fairer sex. I believe the ladies have not shown disrespect for you (& your species) on this forum (Unless i missed something), please also show us the same respect. That is not too much to ask is it? ....above all, to stand.
|
|
|
Rank: Elder Joined: 3/2/2009 Posts: 26,325 Location: Masada
|
Ms Mkenya wrote:@Impunity, some of your comments are just distasteful and disrespectful of women. Your mum & sisters are women too.
Its become tiring hearing these kind of comments from you & other like minded Wazuans. Like in this case, the issue was the gender balance on the nominees. Where does the mounting come in?
Please learn what to say and what to keep as unsaid. At least for the sake of respect for us of the fairer sex.
I believe the ladies have not shown disrespect for you (& your species) on this forum (Unless i missed something), please also show us the same respect. That is not too much to ask is it? @Ms Kenya, I pologise and withdraw the "mounting" part of my statement with due respect to dear ladies of wazua. All in all I hope my point is taken home,only that I must have lacked the proper way of expressing my sentiments about the other learned women. Portfolio: Sold
You know you've made it when you get a parking space for your yatcht.
|
|
|
Rank: Elder Joined: 3/31/2008 Posts: 7,081 Location: Kenya
|
anika66 wrote:Impunity wrote:@bwenyenye, ROR...
I would really want to meet a man who mounts these ladies in their private hoods;I want to be one,where can I hook one? Excuse me! This kind of talk is not proper. FIDA lawyers are not there to be 'mounted in their private hoods' by people like Impunity. This is gender insensitive talk and the modulator should look into this. When I was married to my husband, he used to come home and beat me each time Martha Karua appeared on T.V (which was often during the Kanu/Moi Days. He told his friends that he was 'beating' one of them lawyers. This attitude should not be allowed. Why do men want to use their maleness to suppress women? Why would 'impunity' want to mount a Fida woman just because he feels threatened by them or such? Please let us look at the substance of what FIDA is saying before we personalise issues. ...Mhhhhhhhhhh... So you left him instead of eduacating him. I guess @Impunity just wants to have a variety, not that he is scared of them. And who knows since most men are running away from FIDA women, then you could as well have saved a sould. Please provide contact details to Impunity for some of these FIDA ladies!!!
|
|
|
Rank: Elder Joined: 3/2/2009 Posts: 26,325 Location: Masada
|
Magigi wrote:anika66 wrote:Impunity wrote:@bwenyenye, ROR...
I would really want to meet a man who mounts these ladies in their private hoods;I want to be one,where can I hook one? Excuse me! This kind of talk is not proper. FIDA lawyers are not there to be 'mounted in their private hoods' by people like Impunity. This is gender insensitive talk and the modulator should look into this. When I was married to my husband, he used to come home and beat me each time Martha Karua appeared on T.V (which was often during the Kanu/Moi Days. He told his friends that he was 'beating' one of them lawyers. This attitude should not be allowed. Why do men want to use their maleness to suppress women? Why would 'impunity' want to mount a Fida woman just because he feels threatened by them or such? Please let us look at the substance of what FIDA is saying before we personalise issues. ...Mhhhhhhhhhh... So you left him instead of eduacating him. I guess @Impunity just wants to have a variety, not that he is scared of them. And who knows since most men are running away from FIDA women, then you could as well have saved a sould. Please provide contact details to Impunity for some of these FIDA ladies!!! Portfolio: Sold
You know you've made it when you get a parking space for your yatcht.
|
|
|
Rank: Veteran Joined: 1/7/2010 Posts: 1,279 Location: nbi
|
Looks like he who was looking to mount, has been mounted. Impunity pitia k-street unyonywe. The Governor of Nyeri - 2017
|
|
|
Rank: Elder Joined: 3/2/2009 Posts: 26,325 Location: Masada
|
Wa_ithaka wrote:Looks like he who was looking to mount, has been mounted.
Impunity pitia k-street unyonywe.
... Portfolio: Sold
You know you've made it when you get a parking space for your yatcht.
|
|
|
Rank: Elder Joined: 6/27/2008 Posts: 4,114
|
FROM THE CONSTITUTION: "Supreme Court 163. (1) There is established the Supreme Court, which shall consists of— (a) the Chief Justice, who shall be the president of the court; (b) the Deputy Chief Justice, who shall— (i) deputise for the Chief Justice; and (ii) be the vice-president of the court; and (c) five other judges. (2) The Supreme Court shall be properly constituted for the purposes of its proceedings if it is composed of five judges." Where does it say 1/3 must be women? Nothing is real unless it can be named; nothing has value unless it can be sold; money is worthless unless you spend it.
|
|
|
Rank: Veteran Joined: 12/23/2010 Posts: 1,229
|
mukiha wrote:FROM THE CONSTITUTION:
"Supreme Court
163. (1) There is established the Supreme Court, which shall consists of—
(a) the Chief Justice, who shall be the president of the court;
(b) the Deputy Chief Justice, who shall—
(i) deputise for the Chief Justice; and
(ii) be the vice-president of the court; and
(c) five other judges.
(2) The Supreme Court shall be properly constituted for the purposes of its proceedings if it is composed of five judges."
Where does it say 1/3 must be women? Article 27(8) of the Constitution
|
|
|
Rank: Veteran Joined: 5/31/2008 Posts: 1,076
|
Quote:On their being given 1/3 of the seats by the JSC from the news it seems that among other things they are using Article 27 (8) of the Constitution which provides that: Quote:8) In addition to the measures contemplated in clause (6), the State shall take legislative and other measures to implement the principle that not more than two-thirds of the members of elective or appointive bodies shall be of the same gender. If that Article is applicable then the question should be whether 5 out of 7 is more than two-thirds and not if you can get an exact number for a third from 7. [/quote] And one then wonders how the resident connoisseur Abdinasir could have missed that! Dunia ni msongamano..
|
|
|
Wazua
»
Club SK
»
Politics
»
FIDA halts swearing in of supreme court judges
Forum Jump
You cannot post new topics in this forum.
You cannot reply to topics in this forum.
You cannot delete your posts in this forum.
You cannot edit your posts in this forum.
You cannot create polls in this forum.
You cannot vote in polls in this forum.
|