Sasa its about Raila.....hii ni sycophancy!

@Taz looking @kadonye reply this whole debate on KIHII KIAO misinterpretation is directed at raila.

The argument is uhuru was misinterpreted to show that Kibaki was not uncircumcised like Raila....people are trying to beat around the bush but this debate is all about Being a KIHII.

I agree to some point with some of the argument that NTV were trying to revive the Uncircumcised debate with misinterpreting the real meaning of KIHII KIAO....but if we look at what uhuru was saying he was actually attacking ODM and raila.

A leader is supposed to be responsible. That means they should think about the implications of their actions and utterances. Firstly, I think it is wrong for national leaders to discuss national issues in their mother tongues. Even when nothing wrong is meant, this can create unnecessary suspicion. Secondly, it is reckless for a person of any substance to use words known to have an obvious negative connotation. If you intend to imply the "cleaner" meaning of a word, why take chances? In my view, Uhuru's utterances cannot have been well intentioned. They can were meant to insult, and that calls to question his character as a national leader. The extent of the insult and whether others before him have made the same mistake are both secondary issues in this matter.

@Kenmac

I started this thread and I still reiterate that the problem I raised is about NTV. Their interpretation was wrong and inciting. Why does a leading media house want to incite Kenyans against each other?

And if NTV wants to show what our leaders really said why didn't they report vertim what Raila said at Tononoka.... about Uhuru and Ruto?

NMG as a leading media house has responsibilty to protect this country from politicians. When something like that happens... we should reprimand them (NMG) because if they continue inciting tribes against each other we will be in the same place were in Jan 2008.