wazua Sat, Nov 16, 2024
Welcome Guest Search | Active Topics | Log In | Register

Kenya Railways 260B vs TATU City 240B Projects. Which is more viable
freiks
#1 Posted : Friday, December 17, 2010 6:03:24 AM
Rank: Veteran


Joined: 6/8/2010
Posts: 1,729
Whenever i read the property projects in Kenya i salivate. But am worried that non might ever get in its foot. If they ever do where is it more safe to throw a few coins TATU/KR project?
Life is an endless adventure
Sober
#2 Posted : Friday, December 17, 2010 11:19:46 AM
Rank: Elder


Joined: 11/27/2007
Posts: 3,604
for KR, it is very viable. transport industry is here to stay and road is not that reliable. i am waiting to see the key stakeholders before i give my comments.
African parents don't know how to say sorry.. the closest you will get to a sorry is a 'have you eaten'
2012
#3 Posted : Friday, December 17, 2010 1:01:03 PM
Rank: Elder


Joined: 12/9/2009
Posts: 6,592
Location: Nairobi
KR. It has a great and sustainable future if they get it right.

BBI will solve it
:)
maka
#4 Posted : Friday, December 17, 2010 2:19:28 PM
Rank: Elder


Joined: 4/22/2010
Posts: 11,522
Location: Nairobi
I,l also put my money on KR depending on who they will get to partner with them in this venture...and so true with the way our roads are a good rail system is the only thing that can save us.
possunt quia posse videntur
The Merchant
#5 Posted : Friday, December 17, 2010 5:23:45 PM
Rank: Veteran


Joined: 5/24/2010
Posts: 846
Location: KENYA
KR anyday. I bet alot of investors think so too. If Kr can do this right money will flow in. Private equity guys are scouting the globe for just this sort of thing.
Dod
#6 Posted : Friday, December 17, 2010 5:31:04 PM
Rank: Member


Joined: 10/4/2010
Posts: 223
Location: Afghanistan
What happened to the IT city somewhere in Kambaland?
The rich have money working for them; the poor and the middle class are going to work for money.
wote
#7 Posted : Friday, December 17, 2010 6:50:03 PM
Rank: Member


Joined: 10/18/2007
Posts: 217
None of the two purported projects is viable.Tatu City sounds like a Ponzi Scheme while Kenya Railways whose core business is rail transport have failed in that mandate how can they manage real estate of the proposed calibre. They cann't even get Muthurwa organized.
Modoh
#8 Posted : Saturday, December 18, 2010 1:07:24 PM
Rank: Member


Joined: 12/9/2008
Posts: 43
whats the difference btwn RVR n KR.the kenya railways plan looks very viable but i would sugest they look for a fella of Ciano's(uchumi) calibre.
Msafara wa mamba burukenge hawakosi![/b]
Gatheuzi
#9 Posted : Thursday, December 23, 2010 12:24:52 PM
Rank: Veteran


Joined: 8/16/2009
Posts: 994
@ Modoh, KR manages the railway line while RVR was consessioned to run Locomotives on Kenya Uganda railway. Nairobi Metropolitan interconnecting rail-line is also inder KR.

What KR is doing is to make use of a huge chunk of land it has in the city.
Time is money, so money is time. Money saved is time gained in reverse! Money stores your life’s energy. You expend your energy, get paid money, and store that money for a future purchase made in a currency.
Borsenmakler
#10 Posted : Thursday, December 23, 2010 8:14:57 PM
Rank: New-farer


Joined: 6/22/2010
Posts: 39
Location: Nairobi
KR definately, one the railway system is a public good, so comparing it with tatu is rather absurd.( comparison is only from an investors angle which i think you meant.) anyway we cant move to 2030 without the railroad.
Spread love like violence.
Users browsing this topic
Guest
Forum Jump  
You cannot post new topics in this forum.
You cannot reply to topics in this forum.
You cannot delete your posts in this forum.
You cannot edit your posts in this forum.
You cannot create polls in this forum.
You cannot vote in polls in this forum.

Copyright © 2024 Wazua.co.ke. All Rights Reserved.