thuks wrote:Is it ethical or even legal, for a TV to show a picture of a child who is 'abused' and one can actually recognise her/him?
Ethical I don't know. Illegal? Oskof.
The Children Act, 2001 Section 19 wrote: Every child shall have the right to privacy subject to parental guidance.
The Children Act, 2001 Section 20 wrote: Notwithstanding penalties contained in any other law, where any person wilfully or as a consequence of culpable negligence infringes any of the rights of a child as specified in sections 5 to 19 such person shall be liable upon summary conviction to a term of imprisonment not exceeding twelve months, or to a fine not exceeding fifty thousand shillings or to both such imprisonment and fine.
Now all you need are lawyers to argue on whether it is a violation of the Child's right or not and whether the TV guys should go to jail for 12 months, pay 50k or both.
He who can express in words the ardour of his love, has but little love to express. - Petrach, Son. (That men by various ways arrive at the same end. - Montaigne, The Essays of.)