more weight was given to uncertainty (results not yet released) than to certainty (actual dividend yield)..thus mean uncertainty affect probable price move more than book closure date.

@Pkoli i also expected better due to the fact that they connected 500k accounts in the period under review and yet the results are flat to H1...

I wonder if they'll manage to perform in FY2010

I had predicted that 30 would be resistance for HF and even though it even traded at a high of 32, it soon retreated. It is however worth noting that it has not sunk to where it started the upwards climb (at least not yet).

I have been watching it the last few days and I think it may stabilise at current levels and then resume its bullish trend. I have actually been buying the last few days and am still seeking to add more. I had lightened up considerably earlier. I am now waiting to see whether I will be vindicated.

DISCLAIMER. I have a sizeable position on this counter so I have a positive bias for the counter.

TOTAL BULLOCKS

@Aguytrying i remember putting it down somewhere that these companies trade on 100% the same fundamentals except PBV...

But this does not mean that ones performance has anything to do with the others and by the way HFCK fell back to equity's level only because it went bankrupt...

These companies have completely different business models So unless you can convince me that EB's performance is directly related to HFCK's and vice versa the analysis of price relationship between the two is a hard sell...