I knew this useless ukuyu was up to no good. Hope uganda will achieve what kenya feared to do.

@ Murenj, lets not go tribal but address the issue at hand.

....i think AL KIMANI was stupid to go to Uganda at a time when our brothers are still mourning the dead...its not rocket science that the Ugandans attribute the sad events of that fateful day to some Kenyan Muslims.....you don't go to Uganda talking about human rights when the wounds are so fresh...afinyue!!

Let him face the law….AND LET THE LAW FACE HIM…….kama hii ndio sura ya islam….to hell…the other day ….Al Faisal….businesses; vehicles and other property of our fellow Kenyans were destroyed……hasara tupu…

this reminds me about a believe in islam…...kama wewe si muislamu…you are an infidel not matter who you are…..you are worthless…..ulipe tax heavily and can be mistreated by anyone anyhow…..

Thus wale waliokufa Uganda ni infiedels ..kaffiris….hivyo basi worthless…..

AGAIN I SAW KAMA KUNA SHERIA UGANDA; LET HIM FACE IT ENTIRELY…ABK!

I think Kenya is really celebrating now! They can now hand-over to UG anyone they had evidence was affiliated to the terrorists without eliciting country-wide demos from their sympathisers. But can a muslim brother clarify this: Is it true that it is against the Quran to betray another muslim brother hata kama yeye ni Terrorist No.1???

If Uganda is convinced he had a part to play in the attacks, let them go on with their interrogation and even trial.We should not protect our brothers with criminal behaviour.However, we should not demonise anything Muslim

@Mjuaji

You are right about how Muslims perceive us. But instead of condemning them wholesale, let us change there perception of us (Christians, Hindus, Budhists, Zen Masters, Legio Maria, Jehovah Spectators, Shakers, Atheists etc) buy encouraging dialogue, not invading their countries.

If Somalia does not want you to send soldiers to install a puppet president who is half Italian and half Somali (Yusuf), why do you insist on enforcing the same when even America could not?

First, secure peace in your country before engaging in your neighbors squabbles. Otherwise, if you come to interfere with my domestic issues, I will take the terror into your house.

I do not advocate terrorism in any way. I pains me is to see the actual terrorists calling recipients terrorist. Those hitting back have a right to life and if you don't respect it, then, you should not mourn when you get what you deserved.

Think, guys, think. Who is the biggest TERRORIST in the world?

Another issue: Jews call non-jews "Goyims". Def of Goyim - :

1. Used by racist Jewish supremesists against Christian whites (and browns). Used to strike anger within and start up wars (like when an angry white calls a black a "nigger"). When used, it means that you are lower than the scum at the bottom of a well.

2. To Jews, white straight Christians are to be used as slaves, goyim, when the ends times come.
Do what I say, not what I do, you goyim!

3. In front of God's eyes, 1000 goyims are equivalent to 1 Jew. Which is better, being a Goyim or a Kafir

http://www.thefreedictionary.com/goyim

But, do we go out to accuse Jews, fight them, call them terrorist? No. So, why apply double standards when it comes to Muslims?

If you have followed the origin of insurgents in Islamic countries, you must be aware now that USA had a leading role in financing, training and supporting them. However, at one time, the insurgents discovered America was actually a technical face of someone else and that they were being misused.

Do I need to teach economics and security issues here that Jews control US economy and by extension the worlds economy?

Jews (having discovered they are not safe with an economic and military advancing middle east) advanced the approach of destabilizing Islamic states to save their skin in the future.

The insurgents, however, being more clever than the average desert dweller, decided to hit back.

That is the story we are never told, cauze Jews control the media.

Have you ever asked yourself, "Why is Bush, Blair etc allowed to air their views in all international media while the so called 'Terrorist' never get a hearing?". Is it because they are likely to get a better hearing from the world than the real terrorists in suits?

Why do these western leaders interpret for us what the 'terrorists' want? They say its because the Muslim world is not happy with Western democracy. But is it democratic to force democracy down the throats of Muslim states? Give me a break.

Is the threat of attacks at our back yard related in any way to the Jewish factor? Am heading back to Kabur to finish a book am writing on the same. It's called "The real vampires in Goyim Skin".

In the meantime, if you can get the TV series called "The Last Enemy", do watch it, it will change the way you see the world today.

@Njung'e
...fatwa...

Right on point. Totally agree with this.

@Magigi,
....Fatwa!!....This is killing in the name of god in the believe that once you get up there,you will be given sijui how many unlanded airplanes....Jinga Kabisa.!!....if the good Lord wanted to snuff all of us in a mere second,would he need some mortals with bombs tied to their balls?

Why is this Kimathi fellow ALWAYS involved with the most unsavoury of characters? If it's not Al faisal, it's al shabaab, and now this...Hakuna lawyers in UG?

@Surecroc, it's fellows like Kimathi who give Islam a bad name. You know the zeal with which he defended Al Faisal, the Jamaican preacher even when no one in the rest of the world will touch the fellow. He completely ignored the fact that Al Faisal has been convicted of preaching HATE. His preaching is the 'kill the infidels' type, actually, he preaches that Muslim parents should buy their kids toy guns to prepare them for Jihad, and that killing an infidel buys one a ticket to heaven. What do you expect me to think of Kimathi and his associates?